21st Century Washington Regulatory Risks From The War On Terror

The War on TerrorTargeted Wealth Confiscation Can Be Used By
Following the horrendous 9/11 terrorist attacks,Many Groups To Further Their Evil Agendas
the Bush Administration issued executive ordersInvestors have to consider far more risks from
to accomplish the following objectives:potential Washington asset seizures than just the
1. Broadened the definition of terrorist. This givesprudent or out of control actions of our
the president, or anyone so designated by thegovernment responding to terrorist attacks and
president, the right to label any individual oractions. Our enemies can use Washington
organization as a "terrorist" without a court order,property seizures blamed on other groups to
evidence or additional proof. This immediatelytarget even friends of the United States. For
freezes the assets of the person or entity inexample, bin Laden and other terrorists who
question. Please note that in the future, the newobviously hate the Saudi establishment and
definition could be expanded to cover any liberal,government as much as the US and Israel, could
anti-war advocates, or traditionally conservativehypothetically launch an attack that might appear
groups and individuals. In other words, anyto be from certain rogue elements in the
individual or group the government feels maygovernment of Saudi Arabia, thus giving our
threaten their position.government the right to confiscate Saudi public
2. Closure of U.S. financial markets to 'suspect'and private assets. Given the fact that this
institutions. Washington can close U.S. financialsituation is not too far-fetched to consider how
markets to any country or banking institution thatother governments and peoples who would
they claim have facilitated terrorist transactions.benefit from the financial collapse of Saudi Arabia
This includes any institution that maintained anyand many other Arab nations where the
terrorist funds involved in any such acts even ifleadership supports the US. Innocent investors and
the institution or nation was unaware of suchnations could be caught up in turf battles between
activities. Whatever happened to "innocent untilterrorist groups trying to blame other groups or
proven guilty?" Read Case Study # 10 in Chapternations for their actions.
16, titled "Inadequate Due Diligence."The same could be said for organizations and
3. The option to end all private contracts withindividuals on the far left and right spectrums of
'suspect' terrorists. Finally they now have theAmerican politics. What if the political
option to end all private contracts involving suchestablishment choose to target an innocent
persons or organizations labeled as terrorists.domestic group in order to destroy their wealth
Although these new executive orders wereand political power. Foreign governments and
issued in the aftermath of 9/11, innocentcitizens, as well as non-establishment Americans,
American and foreign investors have much tohave much to fear from the threat of fabricated
fear from these actions. The problem is thatattacks, false blame, and the resulting confiscation
unpopular or non-establishment politicalof assets.
organizations and individuals can now be labeled asProvides law enforcement the right to conduct
"terrorists", and once under federal investigation,"roving" electronic surveillance of suspects instead
all assets can be frozen and unavailable forof specific computer terminals or telephones Now
investment, liquidation, or use in legal actions toinstead of having to request permission to
defend them from potential false charges or toinvestigate suspicious activities, law enforcement
unfreeze the assets.has a free hand to snoop at will. Here again, this
This financial freeze is further complicated by theshows how much our former constitutional and Bill
fact that individuals, including U.S. citizens, can nowof Rights protections have fallen by the wayside
be subjected to indefinite detention and jail timein the War on Terror.
without the right to the courts, the benefit ofRequires all trades and businesses to report cash
counsel, or even being charged with a crime.transactions greater than $10,000 to the
Individuals may also be imprisoned and heldTreasury and to explain the "suspicious
incommunicado without the right and opportunitytransaction" If the feds decide to consider
to contact their family, loved ones, supporters, oranything an American citizen or foreign investor
even a lawyer. The courts have generally held indoes as a "suspicious transaction", note that all
the past that these types of unconstitutionalpersons are subject to investigation and the
infringements are legal for the president tothreat of having their assets frozen without being
employ during times of war. The fact that theconvicted or even prosecuted for a single crime.
United States has not been in a legally declaredAgain, today you are guilty until proven innocent,
"war" since 1945 does not appear to havebut during this period a simple bureaucratic
impressed the "rubber stamp" Supreme Court.mistake or a false charge could cause your
Now I expect some readers will say that this isassets to be frozen. What is worse, all aspects of
just fear mongering, and that the President of theyour business, financial, and personal life can be
United States would never use an Executivedelved into and your property and portfolio assets
Order to take our wealth or property unless theconfiscated.
nation were in a major crisis situation. Well,Gives the IRS the Right to Share Tax Data With
suggest that to the people of Southern Utah.Other Outside Investigators
They are very much aware of the ClintonThe Patriot Act makes any pretext of remaining
Executive Order in which the President createdpersonal or financial privacy just pure wishful
the 1.7 million acre Escalante-Staircase Nationalthinking. The act ends restrictions on domestic
Monument in Utah, without any consultation withinvestigations if the feds claim the investigation
the Utah Governor, or their members of theinvolves national security. This act allows real or
Senate and the House of Representatives.contrived claims of national security, which do not
Evidently, the precedent has been established tohave to be backed up with evidence, to be used
use this power even in everyday policy matters.by the feds to nullify any remaining shreds of
The power of Executive Orders and the Patriotprivacy or civil liberty protections.
Act make the United States a risky place forAllows enforcement agencies and the police the
American and foreign investors (especially Arabright to obtain e-mail message information and
nations and/or private investors) to hold theirreview your browsing patterns and Internet sites
wealth. For example, law enforcement can nowyou look at without a wiretap order
apply for wiretaps and surveillance againstYour rights of privacy and protection against
innocent American citizens using the conditionsunreasonable search and seizure have simply
once required for foreign intelligence work. If aevaporated since 9/11.
government agent wants to wiretap you, all heIts Even Worse With The Homeland Security Act
has to indicate is that he is trying to gatherof 2002
foreign intelligence-- and the tap is in place without"Our most basic freedoms as Americans - privacy
review, constitutional protections or any reason toin our homes, persons, and possessions;
question illegal activities.confidentiality in our financial and medical affairs;
The current War on Terror and Washington'sopenness in our conversations, telephone, and
foreign policy means the United States will remaininternet use; unfettered travel; indeed the basic
in a terrorist war with the related costs, threats,freedom not to be monitored as we go through
and attacks on our liberty for many years toour daily lives - have been dramatically changed." -
come. This will translate into more national or--Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)
financial emergencies that will continue to threatenThis Act extends a list of dangerous and
our remaining liberties and, not to mention, theunconstitutional powers-- from warrant-less
narrow thread by which the Constitution hangs.searches, to federal information databases
The "Misnamed" Patriot Act of 2001containing groups on the left and the right who
"The Patriot Act of 2001 is the greatest singleare concerned about individual privacy and liberty.
assault on personal and financial privacy in U.S.Here are just a few of the troublesome
history." - Bob Bauman, The Sovereign Societyimplications:
On October 26, 2001, President George W. BushAuthorizes the Department of Defense to
signed into law the Uniting and Strengtheningestablish a system of "Total Information
America by Providing Appropriate Tools RequiredAwareness" so they can compile electronic
to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,records about you. These include all bank records
simply known as the Patriot Act. Here are just aand all financial information to e-mail messages in a
few of the provisions of the Patriot Act that cancentralized database.
negatively impact your life, liberty, and wealth.Allows police to eavesdrop on personal telephone
This legislation makes it very easy for theand internet communications without obtaining a
Treasury to confiscate the assets of foreign andcourt order. It requests all Internet Service
American investors with U.S. bank and brokerageProviders (ISPs) to voluntarily disclose information
accounts.concerning any "immediate threat to a
The act allows the government to immediatelynational-security interest" to all state, federal, and
seize the property of any individual, organization,local government entities. Again, they use the
or country that attacks the United States. Note,"national security" excuse in order to destroy our
this is the most threatening provision to foreignrights and liberties.
investors because it is difficult to judge thePlaces limitations on the information American
country or organization behind the next terroristcitizens can request under the Freedom of
attack. For example, as more documents areInformation Act, but does provide criminal
now being released we are not 100% sure whopenalties for any government employees who
was behind the 9/11 attacks and the governmentmight leak or divulge this information to the public
is not willing, even now, to publicize theor individuals.
investigation. Americans will probably never learnAllows the Attorney General to authorize federal
the truth about 9/11, but for the purposes of thisinspectors to carry firearms and make arrests
book, we will concentrate on the repercussionseven without the formality of a warrant. Yet
from the attack on your liberties and wealthagain, warrants and even our former right to
security rather than who was behind the attack.make requests under the Freedom of Information
While our politicians and other American interestsAct are being curtailed.
will make this decision, remember that anyAllows more latitude for government advisory
terrorist can use this provision to target thecommittees to meet in secret...not subject to the
wealth of their enemies offshore-- whetherrequirements of the open meeting laws.
individual, organizational, or national in nature. WeProvides new powers to government officials to
will cover this in Case Study # 6 in Chapter 7declare national health emergencies, which would
titled "Terrorist Nightmare on Wall Street."include quarantines and forced vaccination.