Need For Anti-Terrorism Laws in India

 people who call themselves so because of the
 very reason that India doesn’t have any
November 26th, 2008 the city of Mumbai wokeofficial law to tackle the problem of Terrorism.
to a macabre morning. Mumbai was burning. TheThe country has proved to be unable to curb the
gory fire of terrorism has engulfed the entire cityactivities of barred organizations like Student
and the heat waves could be felt throughout theIslamic Movement of India (SIMI). Due to absence
country and all over the world.23 blasts in lessof strict laws the government has failed to go
than 24hours and 7 terror attacks shook theahead with execution of the death sentence of
nation which has advocated peace and harmonyconvicted terrorists like Afzal Guru. The Congress
for a period immemorial. It took the authoritiesgovernment’s major undertaking after
approximately 40 hours, more than 200 lives andcoming to power was the repealing of the
loss of immense property to bring down thePrevention of the Terrorism Act. India
terrorists and get the city going on a normal pace.doesn’t even have a proper legal backing to
 If we go by facts in India, more than 600deal with terrorism. While many nations world
people have been killed and hundreds have beenover strengthened their anti terror laws after 9
injured in the last 6 years. In 2008, India has been11, our country have taken retrograde steps by
time and again threatened by these terrorabolishing POTA. Thus there is an urgent need of
attacks. To mention a few the Assam blasts onan Anti terrorism law in India.
30th October, 2008 which caused 45 deaths andTwo laws in India were enacted to deal with the
over 100 causalities; Malegaon in Maharashtra andmenace of terrorism in different times. These
Modara in Gujrat which had also been targeted;two laws were heavily criticized and reprimanded
20 synchronized bomb blasts on July 26th inby various parts of the society on the account
Ahmedabad which killed 57 people; 13th May whenthat, these were contradictory and affected the
Jaipur witnessed 7 blasts within 12minutes, shouldHuman Rights of the people. It was also argued
have woken the central legislative authorities inthat anti terrorism laws vitiated the due process
scrutinizing the failure of intelligence and variousof law. There was n uproar in all sections of the
laws dealing with terrorism. But apart from lionizingsociety and they were consequently repealed.
the situation and regretting the aftermath, theThat they flouted the basic concepts of legal
authorities have been sitting on theirinfrastructure cannot be negated. A lot of
responsibilities.criticisms have been faced by the Anti Terrorism
 Why is it so that the government has been stillLaws like, there is a lot of chances of the
disinclined to take stringent rules after so manyinnocent getting convicted and harassed. Due to
vile incidents causing loss of life and property andracist and caste feelings in this country it is very
spreading terror amongst the general public? Whatmuch possible than any individual who is innocent
is it that holds the apex authorities from takingcan fall a prey to such acts and suffer. Anti
precise steps in curbing these terrorist attacks? IsTerrorism Laws are also said to be misused all
it the nexus between our high profile politiciansover the world, especially it could be so in India.
and the bunch of people who call themselves theThe police mechanism of extracting confession by
freedom fighters and actually execute terrorismtorture is refutable, and there is an acute lack of
to its core? Is it the poor intelligence of ourtransparency in the government functioning in
security services or the lack of proper lawIndia. It is also said that harsh terrorist laws may
enforcement or is it the rampant corruption thatalienate the common people and the police. This is
prevails in the very veins of our system?exactly what the terrorist want to spread
 Terrorism has been a part of this human–hatred and revenge, ill feeling, disharmony in
civilization since its evolution and is not a conceptall and every person. Thus no matter how hard
of the new economic world but the means, waysthe Anti terrorism laws are criticized and
and methods of terrorizing has become morediscredited, they are the need of the hour.
gruesome, destructive and lethal in due course ofPrevious laws in India, to deal with terrorism
time. As for a fact, there is no agreed definitionwere- the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities
of the term “Terrorism”. The Webster(Prevention) Act and the Prevention of Terrorism
Dictionary gives a definition of it as,Act.
                           Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)
“The systematic use of terror especially asAct was passed in 1985 and amended in 1987.
means of coercion.”Though the TADA was repealed in 1995. The
Thus it may be concluded that any or every actIndian Government then introduced the Prevention
which causes fear is a terror act. Terrorism mayof Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) on October 2001
also include acts of unlawful violence and war.and the legislature passed the prevention of
There is a old adage that, “one man’sTerrorism Act (POTA) on March 2002. The main
terrorist is another man’s freedomreasons why this laws were abhorred and finally
fighter”.repealed was because it was thought to be in
Terrorism is in sense the segregation andviolation of many fundamental Human rights
marginalization of certain sections of society byenshrined in constitution of India.
the State itself and its machinery, which oftenThough it was struck down, the Prevention of
leads to great upheaval and dissatisfaction in thatTerrorism Act was an important legislative step
group. This in turn results in the group adoptingby the government. This act was enacted on
violent, incorrect and lethal ways to address theirJune 2002. Some of the salient features of the
needs, demands and grievances.Prevention of Terrorism Act were:
LAWS ADOPTED BY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES1. It allowed detention of a suspect for up to 180
TO CHECK TERRORISMdays without filing in charges in court.
1.      South Africa2. It allowed law enforcement agencies to with
 hold the identities of witnesses and treats a
In the Republic of South Africa, a act called theconfession made to the police as an admission of
“Terrorism Act No. 83” was passed inguilt.
1967. This was the first attempt by the3. Some 800 people were arrested and jailed
government on a law which will specifically dealunder the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
with terrorism. This act defined the word4. 4000 people across the country were also
terrorism as “anything that might endangerbooked under the Act.
the maintenance of law and order”.5. 32 organizations were banned as terrorists’
Section 6 of the act stated that, “someoneorganization by the government.
suspected of terrorism to be detained for an 
indefinite period without trial on the authority of aThe National Security Act was also passed along
senior police officer”.with the Unlawful Activities (prevention) Act to
The South African Bureau of State Security wascheck terrorism.
established keeping in mind the provisions of the 
Terrorism Act No. 83. The bureau’s job wasSeverity of the earlier laws and their misuse only
to monitor National Security. The chairman of theserves to underline the need to reframe the laws.
South African Bureau of State Security wasAnti terrorism laws are an absolute necessity for
Hendrik Van Den Bergh. This bureau gave waysociety and it should not be treated as political
for the National Intelligence Service in 1980.issues even if the implementation is questioned by
Eventually the National Intelligence Service wasHuman Rights Forum. Terrorism is not a passing
replaced by South African Secret Service and thephase thus the laws should be efficient, but should
National Intelligence Agency with the passing oftake some considerations like:
the Intelligence Act in 1994.1. The Anti Terrorism laws should not be in
 contravention to any rule of law. The laws should
2.      United Kingdombe within the realm of legal principles.
 2. The Anti Terrorism laws should be uniform and
The United Kingdom has been very active inequal for everyone. There should be uniform
taking a vigilance of various aspects andapplication and execution of the laws.
measures to curb Terror acts from a very long3. The definition of terrorism should be precisely
time. Many Terrorism acts were passed betweennarrowed down to exclude criminal activities. Acts
1974-1989 by the government of Britain. Thewhere the essence of terror is missing should not
United Kingdom has terrorist laws for the last 30be included in the purview of the special laws. This
years initially to deal with the trouble in Northernwould avoid unnecessary conviction and
Ireland.harassment of convicted persons.
  With the passage of time and the concept of4. There should be greater protection given to
terrorism taking stronger grip and becoming morethe witnesses so that there is greater
heinous the Terrorism Laws were modified and aparticipation and co operation by the meek public
number of amendments was brought about. Thewithout any fear and influence.
result was an array of stringent and strict anti5. The terrorist organizations and other such
terrorism laws was enacted. Though these lawsorganizations with the potential to become
were frequently criticized and put down byterrorist organization irrespective of whether
various Human Rights Groups, the Britishterrorist acts are committed by them or not has
government did go ahead with them.to be sanctioned by law. Constant surveillance of
    Terrorism laws were taken seriously afterits leaders, members and supporters is required.
the 9/11 attacks. The United Kingdom passed the6.  Transparency and review procedures would
Terrorism Act in 2000. It was an emergencyhave to be clearly set out in the newly enacted
legislation to increase powers to deal withlaw.
individuals suspected of planning or assisting7. There should be establishment of specialized
terrorist attacks within the United Kingdom.agencies to lessen the burden of the enforcement
Subsequently, the Anti terrorism, Crime andagency of the state. So that the activities under
Security Act, was passed in 2001. It deals withthe special law are properly carried out.
resident foreigners suspected of terrorism could8. The state has to be empowered by law to
be interned without trial, if they could not beprevent recruitment of cadres rising of funds and
deported to another country without breachingother form of support by propaganda and to
British Human rights legislation.scrutinize and freeze funds and assets.
 After the carnage in Mumbai the government is
3.      United States Of Americaplanning to invoke the National Security Act, to
 tighten laws to deal with terrorism. The centre is
After the whole world witnessed the worst terroralso in favour to set up a federal investigation
attack in its history on 9th September, the Unitedagency and tighten the laws to deal with
States of America passed the PATRIOT Act.terrorism more effectively. The government has
The then president of the USA, George Walkeralso promised to choke the infiltration links and
Bush signed into law the PATRIOT Act. It is anfunds to ensure that such elements pay a heavy
acronym for, United and Strengtheningprice for such cowardly and horrific acts of
  America by Providing Appropriate Toolsterrorism. While the NSA would be used to deal
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Actwith situations of this kind exiting laws would be
of 2001.tightened to ensure that there were no loopholes
    The prominent outcome of the PATRIOTavailable to terrorists to escape the clutches of
Act was the increased ability of the lawlaw.
enforcement agencies to search every recordsWe need to win people over, so that there are
and documents. The restrictions on foreignno more recruits, no needless harassment and
intelligence gathering within the United Statestorture to support the public. India needs an anti
were eased. Apart from that the regulation ofterrorism law but we need to first strengthen the
financial transactions by the Secretary of thelaw enforcement machinery. Be more security
Treasury’s authority was expanded. Also, theenabled and sharpen our intelligence services. To
discretion of law enforcement and immigrationstymie terrorist organizations’ and weaken
authorities in detaining and deporting immigrantsthe capabilities of terrorist organization there is an
suspected of terrorism related acts wereurgent need to enact counter terrorist laws. Anti
enhanced.Terrorism laws should be viewed as an efficient
 response within the rule of law. With the NSA
 Coming into force  India has also come in the
It is said that the good governance is the panacealeague of nations boasting of efficient Anti
to all ills. When all the governments in and aroundTerrorism Laws and legislations during these
the world are taking precise steps and enforcingtroubled times. Counter terrorism laws should be
various laws to check and impede the terroristviewed as safeguards for collective security. It is
organizations and activities, India has taken athe efficient implementation of the laws that need
retrograde stand and repealed the only antito be analyzed, rectified and addressed to, the
terrorism law it had.need for Anti Terrorism laws should not be
India may be a easy target for the terrorists orquestioned.