By Douglas J. Hagmann
I’m about to take you on a brief but uncomfortable journey into the land of tin foil hat-wearing conspiracies. I’m not asking you to believe it, just consider it. Think about it. Think outside the box, and as you do, consider all that has taken place over the last few decades, with particular emphasis on the last five years.
Listeners to The Hagmann Report and my appearances on other radio programs might recall my source within the Department of Homeland Security making vague references on at least two occasions to the fictional novel written by John Grisham titled The Pelican Brief. The book came out in 1992 and was made into a movie in 1993 starring Julia Roberts and Denzel Washington. There was no clarification and no clarity offered by my source in terms of the reference he made. I was just told to keep that book/movie in mind in the coming weeks and months.
Given the passage of the Affordable Care Act with Supreme Court Justice John Roberts as the deciding vote, the reference to The Pelican Brief might be making more sense now. Did Roberts appear comfortable in his public pronouncement with regard to “Obamacare?” Did you look into his eyes, the window of one’s soul when he made his announcement? To those with discernment, what did you see?
Remember, this is the same Supreme Court Justice who “flubbed” the swearing-in of Barack Hussein Obama, requiring a do-over behind the scenes. No video, no audio, no exposure of the “legitimate” oath given to Obama by Roberts. Does anyone outside of that room know what was really said at that private, unprecedented swearing-in ceremony? Like I said, folks, it’s full blown tin-foil hat territory in which we are now treading. But just hang in there with me for a bit longer, and maintain your ability to think outside of the box.
It is the stated goal of both the communists and the Islamic terrorists to destroy the free, representative republic known as the United States of America. Perhaps more appropriate, to turn the nation into a communist country or see the flag of Islam flying over the White House and all of America, a step toward the oppression of global governance. Read the Communist goals that were read into the Congressional Record in 1963, and look how many of those objectives have already been accomplished and implemented. Is that a conspiracy theory? I contend that anyone with reasonable sensibilities would agree that the objectives and their implementation is based in fact.
With regard to Islam, look at the charter of the Muslim Brotherhood, and note that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the U.S. State Department much like the Communists in the McCarthy era. Ten years after 9/11, we now have Islamic representatives influencing and dictating security to the Department of Homeland Security. Could this be purely oversight? I don’t think so.
Note that the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) is fully backing a second term of Barack Obama, further calling it “imperative” that he is reelected. During Obama’s first term, we’ve seen some of the most overt Marxist and Communist leaning initiatives launched by Obama, with nary a peep from our elected officials on either side of the aisle. How is that possible?
This writer first disclosed on this web site, with founder and editor Judi McLeod, that members of the media were being systematically threatened into silence over Barack Hussein Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to hold the office of the President. We presented redacted portions of a statement obtained from a well-known (but identity protected) talk show host substantiating this behavior.
We turned over the information to the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse, including Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo, the very information to substantiate our claims. They investigated and publicly confirmed our findings. Those who dared discuss Obama’s eligibility were threatened, harassed, and even placed under surveillance. If the issue of Obama’s eligibility is such a fringe issue embraced by only lunatics and racists, why such a response?
Today, after nearly four years of Obama occupying the White House, we have no truly legitimate verification of who this man is, who was behind his meteoric rise to power, what his legal name is, or his parental lineage. For the self-proclaimed most transparent administration in history, it has been anything but. The well-researched inconsistencies surrounding this man could fill multiple books, and they have. But such inconsistencies are beyond the scope of this article.
To those who treated the issue of eligibility as a fringe topic and a distraction, perhaps hindsight will prove that the issue had everything to do with loyalty to our Republic, just as it was initially intended by our founding fathers. Loyalty is anything but “fringe” or a distraction.
Given the level of deliberate disinformation, the withholding of Obama’s vital bona fides, the suspicion over the legitimacy of his birth records, his social security number, college transcripts, and so on, do you really know who this man is? We know he attended a Muslim school, and described the Islamic call to prayer as one of the most beautiful sounds he’s ever heard.
We know he also attended a church that taught Black Theology, although did his best to distance himself from both ideologies for the purpose of his campaign. In reality, however, we know less about this man than we do his dog.
Considering that, is it beyond the realm of possibility that this man was selected to advance a specific agenda?
Many factors prohibit the takeover of the United States by military might. The best chance for success in capturing the United States and turning it into a Marxist, Communist, or Islamic country is from the inside. Those who believe that the plans are in place for a “New World Order,” or one world governance via the United Nations, understand that certain ideological, moral, and political principles must be neutered. The United States, as a sovereign nation, is an impediment to such plans unless a “Manchurian Candidate” could be snuck into the highest levels of government.
Meanwhile, that individual could use certain groups, unelected officials, and a series of executive orders to implement the diabolical plans of the globalists, as global governance is the dictatorship of the proletariat under the umbrella of Communism. Islam is the key to eroding the Judeo-Christian heritage on which this country was founded.
The systematic takeover of the U.S. did not happen overnight, and not a shot needed to be fired. The spirituality on which this country was founded has been under attack for decades. God has been removed from nearly every aspect of public life, and our once distinctive morality that separated us from other nations has been bastardized.
Map out all significant events beginning with World War I, the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the League of Nations, the United Nations, FDR, Watergate, Iran Contra, 9/11, and all other incidents of historical importance. The common threads that comprise this takeover from within all encompass government-sanctioned deceit at various levels.
I contend that our country is filled with enemies of the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, who are working against the principles on which our once proud country stood. If you cannot see the changes, you can certainly feel them. If you cannot feel them, then it is my contention that your moral compass needs to be recalibrated.
The Republican-Democrat, right-left paradigm touted by so many television and radio mouthpieces is essentially dead. It has been replaced with an Oligarchy, a nation of powerbrokers, “kleptocrats,” and “banksters.” Most leaders of America have succumbed to greed and power.
Anyone who has researched the “Affordable Health Care Act” knows that it has more to do with power and control than health care. That said, today’s decision was another nail in the coffin of our country, compliments to the Supreme Court. Let’s take a brief look at what happened today and how this vote came to be.
The bill was passed without it having even been read, and pushed through the system in a manner never before seen. People scoffed at the existence of death panels, tax funded abortions, rationed care, and so on. Even in the face of proof, buried within the bill, all have been verified to exist.
The bill takes aim at state’s rights and personal freedoms and liberties, which are cornerstones of a free America. The bill pits government against religious beliefs, although will allow exemptions for the protected ideology of Islam. The bill wages war against Judeo-Christian faith, and it does so overtly, despite the hollow denials of Obama himself.
It was Chief Justice Roberts who is labeled as the man who changed history by siding with the justices having a track record of curtailing the liberties of American citizens. It was the same man who swore in Obama in the do-over, in private. It was the same man who had the look of pain and conflict in his eyes as he announced his decision.
Could it be that Chief Justice Roberts, through threat or duress, or some other knowledge or circumstance was compelled to make this decision in the same manner we now know the 2008 bailout decision was made – by the threat of domestic economic Armageddon?
Before dismissing this as pure lunacy, I again urge you to think, analyze, research, probe, and search thoroughly and carefully the events of the last few years. Economic collapse is on the horizon, although most refuse to believe that financial Armageddon is a certainty. This, despite the unsustainable growth of our debt.
And what about all of those Executive Orders? How about the passage of a bill that defines all of the U.S. as a battleground? How about the 450 million rounds of ammunition ordered by DHS? The bullet proof booths, the VIPER teams, the TSA, and so on. What about the most recent Executive Order, signed by Obama this week, that places the U.S. in a state of national emergency?
Most will choose to believe that this is business as usual, or perhaps not think much of it at all. Most will believe that the decision of Roberts to allow the implementation of this draconian 3,000-page bill is just the way he decided to vote. Perhaps, but perhaps there’s more to it than that.
I believe that the ultimate ramifications of this ruling are being minimized, skewed, and downplayed, even by those in the conservative talk show arena. I also believe there’s more at play here than meets the eye. I’m not asking you to believe it, but I am asking that you open your mind to it.
In the end, it’s all about control of the American people, and this is a giant leap in that direction. Think about it.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Tune to any television or talk radio program, or visit any website driven by political agendas. You will find self-styled experts and pundits making predictions about the Supreme Court ruling regarding the health care bill. Their predictions are primarily based on the questions posed by the justices. While the legal disposition of this issue is arguably the most important in the history of our republic, and the attention is well deserved, real-world experience and three-dimensional thinking appear to be mostly absent from the analysis.
Those who are basing their predictions on the questions posed by the judges obviously lack real-world experience. Having occupied seats in numerous courtrooms in many venues, I would never attempt to predict rulings based on questions posed by judges or juries. While juries are unpredictable, judges often ask questions to trigger discussion or open debate. I’ve seen judges who appeared to take an adversarial approach to a certain aspect or element of a case and later rule in favor of that which they appeared to have a certain bias against. I suspect that the vast majority of seasoned lawyers would agree.
Yet, an article written by David Savage appeared in The Los Angeles Times yesterday titled “Justices poised to strike down entire healthcare law.” The author’s premise was based on the questions raised in open court by Judges Scalia and Kennedy, suggesting that they have all but formalized their ruling against the constitutionality of the matter.
But wait, socialists and progressives, it might be premature to rend your garments. And hold on, all you conservatives, the premature celebration could be embarrassing.
Real-world experience dictates that it would be a sophomoric mistake to even attempt to predict the outcome of any case, including one before the highest court in the U.S., based on questions in open court. But that’s mere thought candy – the trappings of an intellectually challenged media – or perhaps evidence of their complicity in the destruction of our country by failing to expose the core issue that few Americans appear to comprehend.
As Americans, we were given a tremendous gift by our founding fathers; a Republic, if we can keep it, to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin. Have we, the people, become so intellectually hobbled that we are unable to understand that this case is not about health care at all?
The health care bill is not now and never has been about health care but about the systematic dismantling of our constitutional republic through unprecedented control. It has been in progress for decades, yet few have had the guts, will, or capacity to stand up and expose the agenda and people behind it. Anyone who dared to expose the agenda, identify the individuals or even hint at the objectives in play has been publicly mocked, ridiculed, marginalized, and muzzled by both sides of the fictitious two-party divide, conservatives and progressives alike.
The same conservative constitutional watchdogs who are now transfixed on the Supreme Court’s actions and pending decision on this landmark case fail to realize or admit that we arrived here, compliments of, in part, their failures. Their blind allegiance to one side of a false political paradigm and consequential inaction has facilitated enemies of our republic to destroy us from within.
The decision of the Supreme Court will indeed be pivotal, but arriving at this point was preventable.
If a post-mortem of our constitution is warranted, check your hands for blood stains and the autopsy report for your name. Just make sure that when the death certificate is posted online, it is genuine. If not, just ignore it, treat it as a fringe issue, and mock anyone who dares speak up.
You know, just stay the course.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
The current headlines that describe the Obama administration’s full frontal assault against our Judeo-Christian values and, specifically, the Catholic church in America through mandatory birth control policies reveal a much larger and more disturbing agenda that is being missed or deliberately omitted by the corporate media.
Investigation into what has been happening behind the scenes exposes alarming facts that will affect everyone in America, regardless of their faith.
Despite the administration’s claims and the sound bites from lawmakers, the current battle is not about providing Americans with affordable health care and never was. By following the money trail and influence behind the actions of this administration, it is clear that the current rift is a byproduct of final stages of implementing Marxist-Leninist socialism in America.
Since his first day in office, Obama has been leading the U.S. on a direct path to socialism. He has nationalized portions of the banking industry, taken over parts of the automobile industry. He is now engaged in socializing our healthcare industry, which encompasses about twenty percent of our national economy. Replacing capitalism with socialism requires control over that segment of our national economy.
Obama and the globalist powers behind him know history. They understand that the most formidable obstacle to socialism in the former USSR was religion and the church. True socialism cannot coexist with Judeo-Christian principles, as socialism denies the fundamental tenet of religious faith that God created man and man needs God.
To neutralize and then eliminate the obstacle of the church, Obama and his agents are using the divide and conquer strategy. Within the last decade, there has been a skillfully orchestrated approach to dividing the Catholic Church through the formation and funding “Catholic” organizations that adhere to and promote the socialist agenda. Two of the larger organizations, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United, both promote “social justice” and the tenets of socialism.
Research has documented that both organizations have received funding, in part, by George Soros through his Open Society Institute (OSI). Throughout the last decade, it was discovered that Soros’ OSI group gave Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good $150,000 (2005 and 2006). Investigation found that John Podesta, founder of the Center for American Progress (CAP), which is funded in part by George Soros and tightly connected to both Obama and the Clintons, serves on their advisory council among other progressive activists. A review of 501(c)3 documents also shows a financial connection between Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United.
By promoting the progressive agendas of these and similar organizations, Obama is successfully creating a division within the Catholic church in an attempt to cause chaos from within. Unless exposed, it just might work.
The last remaining obstacle in the U.S. to implementing a full socialist agenda in the U.S. is the church. In Obama’s world and those behind him, this “obstacle” must be removed for his agenda to be successful. They were readily provided the vehicle to accomplish this in full view of every American through the Affordable Care Act.