Yes, the government is coming for our guns. They want us disarmed, so they don’t have to worry about getting shot at when they go into “full Communist” mode. They hate that.

Yesterday, Joseph Robinette Biden used his yearly allotment of carbon credits by taking Air Force One to Monterey Park, California, to apparently exploit the victims of a January shooting. The Dick-Tater-in-Chief, believing he has the ability to not only govern by executive fiat, amend the US Constitution with the stroke of a pen, and use the US Office of the Attorney General as his own private, weaponized army (oops, already happened), stated the following:

“My executive order directs my Attorney General to take every lawful action possible to move us… to universal background checks without legislation.”

Joey “six-shooter” Biden
Believe them when they tell you their plans (CNN – 2020- pre-election)

According to the White House:

Specifically, the President is directing the Attorney General to move the U.S. as close to universal background checks as possible without additional legislation by clarifying, as appropriate, the statutory definition of who is “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms, as updated by the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.

White House Fact Sheet

Of course, Hunter Biden documented himself allegedly violating the rules and has yet for his (alleged) crimes that he recorded to his own laptop.

Image captured from Hunter Biden’s laptop – Hunter Biden holding handgun

Under the executive order, Biden is also directing Attorney General Merrick Garland to develop and implement a plan to prevent former federally licensed firearms dealers, whose licenses have been revoked or surrendered, from continuing to engage in the business of dealing in firearms.


SOURCE: Washington Examiner

“Any time you have evidence of private entities coordinating with federal agents to strip Americans of their rights, the public should be alarmed and demanding answers and action. This is just the latest terrifying new instance of the illegal NICS self-submission form being used in nefarious ways, and those who used it to violate the public’s trust must be held to account.”

Aidan Johnston, federal affairs director, Gun Owners of America

The Biden regime, handled by the Obama Communists embedded in the DC swamp, WANT YOUR GUNS. They are doing much in the background in order to get them, including using (for example) the ATF to classify any pistol with a brace a short barreled rifle. Please read the excellent article by Gabe Kaminsky and related reports about what is really taking place – without much pushback – and against our rights as Americans.

ALSO NOTE: Between 2016 and 2019, the FBI presented forms to U.S. citizens at their homes and in other undisclosed locations that registered them with the bureau’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System, the Washington Examiner previously reported. Newly obtained records, however, date the FBI’s usage of the form back to 2011. [Emphasis mine]

READ/WATCH: Washington Examiner Videos

Tags: FBIgunsNewsSecond AmendmentDepartment of JusticeNews

Original Author: Gabe Kaminsky

Original Location: FBI worked secretly with hospitals to strip US citizens’ gun rights, documents show

By Douglas J. Hagmann

As appeared in the Wisconsin Christian News

According to the 2021 National Firearms Survey, 32% of Americans over 18 years-old admit to personally owning a firearm, meaning that more than 81.4 million Americans own guns. Additional research concludes that when family members who live in the same household with a gun owner are included, there is at least one gun in an estimated at 44% of households in the US, according to a recent Gallup survey. Furthermore, there are over 393 million guns owned by private citizens (not counting the military or police), or the equivalent of 120 firearms per 100 citizens. About 78% of Americans who admit to owning guns own an average of five-(5) firearms, while approximately 22% of gun owners only own one.

Consider that in 2020, there were nearly 40 million guns legally purchased in the US, according to FBI records – the highest number of purchases ever recorded for a single year. In 2019, the number of purchases were recorded at just over 28 million firearms, an increase of nearly 40% in 2020 alone. This year, we appear to be on track to match or perhaps exceed the purchases of the prior year.

In the wake of the Uvalde school shooting and just like every other “mass shooting event” in recent memory, clamor for more stringent gun laws (whatever that means) are increasing in shrillness and intensity by every unthinking pseudo-intellectual with a smart phone and a social media account. These “mile-wide, inch-deep” social influencers and elected lawmakers believe that more laws that restrict gun ownership will solve a problem that’s rooted in the moral and spiritual decay of a nation, while the justice and law enforcement systems which are already in place have been intentionally neutered by enemies of our American history, heritage, and way of life.

Consider the above gun ownership statistics against the calls for stricter gun control legislation. Also, consider the likely remedies that we could possibly see enacted and enforced by the entrenched federal “Uniparty” who have already weaponized the Department of Justice against the most dangerous of all domestic terrorists – the daring cabal of parents and concerned citizens who voice their objections at school board meetings against the perverse indoctrination of their children with LGBTQ and Critical Race Theory. We’ve already witnessed how this Justice Department, under the current leadership of Merrick Garland, has demonized the political and moral opponents of the Uniparty, whether they are outspoken at school boards, city council meetings or even political rallies on issues ranging from CRT, election integrity, COVID and objectionable school curriculum. We are now considered to be the biggest threats in America.

In a column written and published in The Blaze on June 1, 2022, Daniel Horowitz wrote: “Let’s not forget that in the country we live in today, our government considers [social and political] conservatives to be the biggest red-flag threats to society. In February, the DHS posted a National Terrorism Advisory System bulletin identifying ordinary people who hold different views as the elites on COVID policies and election security as the number-one terrorism threat. Under ‘Key factors contributing to the current heightened threat environment,’ the very first factor listed is ‘The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions.’”

The Process Becomes the Punishment

         While we remain primarily focused on the possibility of sweeping gun laws that restrict certain types of weapons, we tend to lose sight of the more insidious possibilities that sound more sensible and even palatable to the staunchest conservatives considering the widespread gun ownership. Expanding, for example, existing red-flag laws that would permit the government to strip a citizen of their constitutional rights of gun ownership and even their freedoms, simply based on a complaint by a school board official or teacher would have a chilling effect on a law-abiding gun owner to speak out at a public-school board meeting. Speaking against a perverse agenda or exposing corruption might not only result in your designation as a threat and ejection from a meeting, but it could cost you your freedoms and your guns as well.

While it would seem to be difficult, if not nearly impossible, to separate Americans from their guns through outright banning and wholesale confiscation, considering the sheer numbers of guns and gun owners, might their tactics be wrapped in such a noble-sounding cause of addressing the most dangerous threats to their utopian society? As Daniel Horowitz pointed out in his column, consider what happened to many physicians who prescribed Ivermectin to treat COVID patients. The state medical licensing boards threatened to take away their medical licenses, in many cases “based on complaints – not from patients, but from political enemies.” In some cases, doctors were required to submit to psychological examinations, and were relentlessly harassed because they failed to submit to the will of their overlords. I submit that the situation here is and would not be dissimilar.

By speaking out against an objectionable public policy, you can now be classified as a domestic terror threat and have your guns taken and even prohibited from living in a household where other members own guns. The same could happen should you post a comment perceived to be a threat on a social media platform. And this is merely the beginning. After all, many of us who have experienced any kind of adverse actions based on our beliefs and practices, have learned that the process itself is the punishment.

Meanwhile, the federal government can chip away at the guns themselves. They can (and perhaps will) reinstitute and even expand the useless and ineffective “assault weapons ban.” They can limit the capacity of magazines and make parts and ammunition both unaffordable and unavailable.

Those in positions of power know that unarmed Americans are not citizens. They are subjects. Just as America has been an annoying speed bump on the road to a Communist-Globalist objective, so too are armed Americans who are vocally opposed to this “Great Reset.”

I suspect that “sensible” gun reform will not only pass but be praised by many on both sides of the political dias as some great compromise that preserves the rights of socially, morally and politically conservative Americans. It will, however, be a Trojan Horse that will shred the rights of American citizens. Such tactics are designed to render us both voiceless and defenseless against the criminal wiles of our totalitarian government. After all, it is us – Christian conservatives who believe in God, right and wrong, the sanctity of life of the unborn, marriage between a man and a woman, and the pride of nationalism who are the enemies the globalists detest. They want us out of their way. Dead, if necessary. It’s not the guns, it’s us.

On behalf of those who gave their lives for our freedoms and future generations, we must fight and resist at all costs all attempts to disarm us. History provides ample illustrations of what happens next should we fail.

Prepare. Pray.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

The 1979 movie And Justice For All is arguably the best cinematographic display of insanity and corruption in our legal system that remains relevant today. It remains a near-perfect illustration of judicial absurdity combined with personal and professional hubris that is repeated over and over in the U.S. The faces and names might change, but it was, and still is, a clear indictment of our legal system and specific individuals who believe themselves to be above the law.

In the battle against citizens’ rights to bear arms, such individuals occupy not only seats of power in the federal government but in various state governments as well. The issue of gun control has largely been most visible at the federal level over the last century. Due to the Constitutional issues beyond the scope of this article, it is arguable, however, that an individual’s right to own firearms under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, independent of federal control, might well fall within the jurisdiction of each state. This is exactly what we are now witnessing. At present, there are approximately 1,300 bills pending at the state level to change firearm laws, according to the San Francisco-based Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. The majority of such legislation is decidedly against the law-abiding, gun-owning citizen. Virulently so.

States becoming “Ground Zero” for gun legislation

One famous scene from And Justice For All played out almost verbatim during an April 30, 2013, meeting of the New Jersey State Law and Public Safety Committee when committee chairman New Jersey State Senator Donald Norcross shouted to one constituent, identified as New Jersey resident James Kaleda “You’re out of order!” Almost as if he was following the script written for Al Pacino, James Kaleda retorted, “this meeting is out of order!” It was, perhaps, the most fitting assertion during an otherwise uneventful four-hour long session where it appeared that the passage of seven-(7) new restrictive state gun control measures were decided long before the hearings began.

What egregious offense did Mr. Kaleda commit that compelled Senator Norcross to shut off his microphone and have him physically escorted from the public meeting? Some might contend that it’s a bit difficult to tell, but a simple utterance of “gun control” might have played a part. It appears that Senator Norcross, acting with the imprimatur of the federal government to disarm his law-abiding constituents, has also been emboldened to disallow discordant discussion despite its intellectual value. And there it is, ladies and gentlemen, a textbook example of the inextricable connection between our right to bear arms and our right to free speech.

While this might seem like a non sequitur at first blush, let me remind you that it was this gun control “lawmaking process” of the New Jersey Law and Public Safety Committee that was the stage setter for the “hot mic” comments captured at the conclusion of the New Jersey Senate Budget & Appropriations Committee just nine days later. It was during the latter meeting that the candid comments of three New Jersey State senators revealed their true intent of gun legislation: confiscation.

While that meeting received the most public attention, as everybody loves the unscripted “hot mic” moment, the unbridled tyranny displayed during this meeting slipped under the radar of many. It shows that we, the American people and residents of certain states, are not being treated as citizens but as subjects to a royalty that dare not be questioned. It illustrates why we must never accept constraints on the rights delineated by our Constitution, the very document that so many have died for, and the reason behind today’s holiday. It also shows the depths to which certain elected miscreants will sink to avoid having the truth spoken in a public forum.

The rest of the story: Fighting back

James Kaleda was effectively silenced by the arbitrary, tyrannical actions of a power-imbibed state senator with his fingers poised and trembling over a microphone kill switch. He was escorted from the building with the wave of his hand by armed state police sworn to uphold the Constitution, but instead serving as the official state muzzle of unbridled tyranny and the hubris of one man. The story, however, does not end there.

As I watched the two-minute, forty-second video, I was alarmed at the audience clapping, with some giving a standing ovation, as Mr. Kaleda was being escorted from the halls of injustice. Why, I asked, were these people clapping at their own rights being ripped from them? Have we all finally succumbed to some ultimate brainwashing? Not at all, according to attorney Billy Baer, who, with Daniel Haggerty, was present at the meeting and secured the video footage of this entire incident.

The spectators at the meeting were incensed. They were outraged not only at Senator Norcross, but at the behavior of the entire committee of elected officials turned royalty. When told to sit down and shut up (my words) by the king’s court, many within the gallery rose and began to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in defiance of the trampling of the rights of not just Mr. Kaleda but all residents of New Jersey and all citizens of America.

Befitting to his majesty’s smug position of royalty, Senator Norcross remained seated during this pledge to the patriotism of our country and for which it stands. Not one of these royal elites had the decency to stand.

If Senator Norcross and those like him have any doubt whatsoever, Americans are getting angry. From the crowd, you can hear one man yelling… “you woke a sleeping giant!” We are getting angry at the cesspool of arrogance among the elected elite, and we’re reaching a point where it will no longer be tolerated.

Contrary to your belief that America is your kingdom, we will not be ruled like subjects. You have shown that you can turn off the microphone and escort one person from your presence who disagrees with subjugation, but you will not be able to extinguish the voices of us all. Today of all days, as we look upon the acres of tombstones of those who have died before us, know that there are more willing to make the ultimate sacrifice so our children can live in freedom and not under tyranny.

Video of Mr. Kaleda talking and being ejected
Video of the crowd’s reaction and Pledge of Allegiance
Senator Norcross contact information

By Douglas J. Hagmann

Every American gun owner, regardless of the state in which you live, is presently or will be the target of gun confiscation. A state-by-state framework of confiscation is being erected in front of us all to strip us of our rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. A “hot” microphone serendipitously caught proof of this nefarious intent of disarming citizens at the conclusion of the May 9, 2013, meeting of the New Jersey State Legislature.

At the conclusion of the New Jersey Senate Budget & Appropriations Committee meeting last Thursday, an open microphone caught three state senators, identified by voice as Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, Assistant Majority Leader Sandra Cunningham, Senate Majority Whip Sandra Cunningham, and at least one staff member talking candidly about their intent to confiscate all guns from the people they serve. It should be noted that Senator Loretta Weinberg is the chief proponent of the anti-gun legislation being moved through the New Jersey State Senate.

Although some of the candid conversations are difficult to discern due to the ambient noise, their message is clear. “We need[ed] a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate,” stated one high-ranking senate member. “They don’t care about the bad guys.  All they want to do is have their ‘little guns’ and do whatever they want with them,” added another in a demeaning manner. Another conceded that gun owners do want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals but added that “they don’t have any regulations to do it.” Oh really?

For anyone doubting the bitter contempt these legislators hold for gun owners and pro-Constitutionalists, a YouTube video that captured the “open microphone moment” is available for review.

During the second hour of The Hagmann Report that aired last night, we interviewed the highly credentialed Scott Bach, Esq., Executive Director of the Association of the New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, who explained the draconian laws being written and passed in the State of New Jersey. “Clearly, this is about nothing less than disarming the American public, and the current battleground is in New Jersey,”  stated Mr. Bach. “You might not be experiencing it in your state… yet, but you will. It’s just a matter of time.”

We must do everything we can to preserve, protect and defend our Second Amendment rights, or we will lose much more. Regardless of where you live, the fight is coming to you if it has not yet arrived. We must be proactive, and yes, we can make our voices heard to counter the utter contempt of these lawmakers regardless of your state of residence – while we still have the chance. Let’s hold these opponents of our constitutional rights accountable for their words and actions.

The time is now, and the fight has been left to us. Make your views known and your voice heard by contacting the NJ Senate Majority Office by phone (609-847-3700) and/or fax (609-633-7254). Do it before it disappears as an option.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

Presently flying under the radar of the American people is the much misunderstood,  deliberately mischaracterized, and under-reported United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty. Considering the persistent multi-level attacks against U.S. gun owners and American’s rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the “Final U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty” that convened yesterday and is scheduled to last through March 28, 2013, should be front page news all across America. But it’s not, and for good reason.

Most people, including conservative Americans, thought the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was a dead issue, or at least not a threat to U.S. gun owners based on a number of assumptions relating to international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. Like everything else with the Obama regime, however, things are never what they appear, nor are they as simple as we are led to believe.

But first, let it be made clear that Barack Hussein Obama is on record as being against the private ownership of firearms by American citizens. This might surprise anyone who listens to the hysterically-pitched assertions by such Obama lapdogs as Chris Mathews and Lawrence O’Donnell, for example, who contend that Obama has posed no threat to private gun ownership as President. Such assertions are only convincing to those who have not done any research into this matter.

Obama vs. the Second Amendment

Barack Hussein Obama has a long and well-documented history of gun control, going back as far as his law school days. There, he was mentored by Laurence Tribe, a staunch opponent of gun rights of American citizens. In 1994, Obama was a member of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago-based charitable organization that, in part, is a proponent of various anti-gun groups and related agendas.

In 2003, Obama voted in support of legislation that would have banned privately owned hunting shotguns, target rifles, and black powder rifles in Illinois. While running for political office in 2004, Obama called for national legislation to prevent anyone but law enforcers from carrying concealed firearms. As reported in the February 20, 2004 edition of The Chicago Tribune, Obama was quoted as “back[ing] federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”

In the April 2, 2008 edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama was quoted stating, “I am not in favor of concealed weapons… I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” As an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted twice against SB 2165, more commonly known as the “Castle Doctrine,” which would permit household occupants to defend themselves through the use of firearms.

Perhaps most nefarious and telling of all is what Obama whispered to Sarah Brady during a meeting on 30 March 2011 concerning gun control:  “I just want you to know that we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

By far, and despite the intent of Obama-supported organizations such as Fact Check and Media Matters, it is clear that he is the most anti-Second Amendment (putative) President ever to hold office.

U.S. arms control via the UN

Perhaps most disconcerting about the present actions of the United Nations is the cavalier attitude held by most, including many conservatives, that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be completely impotent against the U.S. Constitution and Americans’ rights under the Second Amendment. After all, it is argued that to be effective, such a treaty would require Senate ratification, and at present, such ratification would have a “zero possibility” of passage. Such thinking is consistent with a normal political atmosphere and an administration that has a genuine respect for the U.S. Constitution. Considering what we’ve seen over the last decade, does the recent track record of our elected leaders alleviate your concerns?

Consider that within 24 hours of his re-election, Obama pushed for a new round of international negotiations to revive the very U.N. treaty he visibly backed off of in the months leading to the 2012 elections. Isn’t this act alone enough to trip some alarm bells, even among the most skeptical?

It should also be noted that on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty,  concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.” A review of this four-page document reveals certain questionable assumptions on which that conclusion is based.

This is a warning to all Americans that the Obama support of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty can lead to some “UN-intended” consequences to Americans’ right to own and bear arms. Americans looking at this issue are failing to look at the larger picture, which is the ultimate subjugation of the United States to global governance. This can most effectively be accomplished through the disarmament of its citizens, especially in the face of violent outbreaks as the U.S. and the world’s economic systems begin to unravel.

The machinations of the Obama regime within the inner workings of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty must not be underestimated. We must look at the bigger picture and the end-game objectives of the globalists pulling the puppet strings. All is not what it appears.

America finds itself “over a barrel” (perhaps literally), and at the precipice of financial Armageddon due to the coming collapse of the U.S. dollar.  It is most important for people to understand that our financial destruction has been orchestrated for a generation or more and has been intentionally accelerated over the last two decades to complete a specific agenda.

In order to survive what is coming, it is imperative to understand that agenda, who and what is behind it, and the motive. The bigger picture will connect some very important dots.

All is well in the land of Oz

America is in serious financial trouble, and events on the immediate horizon will forever change our lifestyle. However, if you are like me, trying to convince your friends at work, your neighbors, or perhaps even your spouse that this is true is a formidable (if not impossible) task.  They might counter your warnings by pointing to the people walking out of retail stores with big ticket items, or if they are trying to appear more astute, cite the positive gains in the stock market while snickering at you for buying silver at nearly $50 per ounce, while it now hovers at $30 per ounce. You might have even been called a doomsayer or conspiracy nut for buying storable food or extra items for your pantry. However (if their ego permits it), these will be the same people who will turn to you for answers and practical advice when the financial house of cards falls to the floor.

What people see is not reality but their perception of reality due to the conditioning and brainwashing by our elected leaders and the complicit corporate media. The American public has been conditioned and brainwashed en masse into believing a lie.

It is an accepted mantra that the bigger the lie, the more readily people will believe it. That is the case in which we find ourselves today. The entire world (especially Americans and the West) is in for a “crude awakening.” In our current state, perception is not reality. We are being subjected to lie upon lie that feeds our normalcy bias. “Things will never get as bad as you say, at least not here in America,” is a common statement that you might be hearing. Others will argue that intervention by our government will prevent any significant financial disaster. They don’t understand that it is the elements within our government (or elements working in conjunction with our elected leaders) who are responsible for the financial crisis that we will soon face.

What is the truth?

The truth is that America is a “captured operation.” It has been captured from within. The Democrat-Republican, right-left paradigm is nothing more than an erroneous perception that permits the illusion of dueling agendas when, in fact, there is only one. For example, how else would one explain the continuity of agenda between George W. Bush and Barack Obama?

If one accepts the fact that America is a captured operation, then it would be reasonable to ask, “Captured by whom or what?” And, “What is the end-game objective of those controlling the puppet strings? Who are the puppet masters?”

To gain insight and answer these questions, it is logical to follow the investigative adage, “follow the money,” and to understand that “he who owns the gold makes the rules.” To gain a further understanding of our precarious position, it is also important to have a basic understanding of the U.S. dollar.

Since the dollar was taken off the gold standard on August 15, 1971, by then-President Richard Nixon, many believe that it is not backed by anything of value and is nothing more than a promise on a piece of paper. Technically, that would appear to be true. But in reality, the current stability of the U.S. dollar is backed by oil or the promise of unrestricted access to the flow of oil.

There is a lot of history about our economic system that should be known and understood, including the creation of the privately owned cartel of central banks that was made legal under the Federal Reserve Act and is now chaired by Ben Bernanke. That history, however, would be better served by a more extensive column at another time. Currently at issue is how things are about to play out for the average Americans who are straddled by growing and oppressive debt, to the point that we have shamelessly permitted our own children and the future generations of America to be sold into financial slavery.

As Americans, we are over a barrel. If you look closely at the fine print on that barrel, you will see that the barrel is fully owned by the Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We are the puppets of the Saudis, lock, stock and barrel. But there is more.

Confluence of events

If you find it difficult to accept that we are operating as a “branch office” of the Saudis, then consider our current financial and geopolitical situation, and work backward. Consider the meteoric rise to power by Barack Hussein Obama. Do you really believe that he rose to power on the merits of his political career as a junior senator from Illinois? What about the funding his campaign received from foreign donations, that was noted as an anomaly, yet not audited to the point of precise origin. Could not much of that money be traced to Saudi Arabia, or to specific elements acting on their behalf?

How about Obama’s education, including (but not limited to) his acceptance into Harvard? Who footed the bill? A bit of investigative research points to funding that originated from a very wealthy Saudi prince. But at what cost, or with what strings?

There are many more examples of his Saudi ties, and his capitulation to their agenda of a pan-Islamic state via the Muslim Brotherhood. These are available to anyone who is willing to perform the research.

The most significant bit of evidence of all, however, relates to Obama’s actions as the President of the United States, especially in one specific event: Benghazi.

Although one has to look no further than his war against developing a domestic oil drilling and refining program, the most blatant evidence of Saudi control can be found in his actions related to the September 11, 2012 murderous attacks in Benghazi. It is here that the curtain shielding the truth is pulled back, and some very important pieces of evidence become exposed. The events that took place in Benghazi reveal that the United States is providing the military muscle, the sweat and blood of our men and women in and out of uniform, to accomplish the objectives of the Saudis. It was a military extension of the much celebrated Arab Spring, which (contrary to media accounts) is a Saudi plan of expansion.

It is Benghazi that provides a glimpse into the truth, and is the reason that the Obama regime has viciously fought against any attempts at getting to the truth. Truth will reveal that America, to further the agenda of the Saudis, was involved in the largest arms supplying operation in history. We were providing the anti-Assad rebels with the arms and technical assistance to overthrow Assad, destabilize Syria, and (like Egypt) install a puppet of the Muslim Brotherhood. For detailed information on Benghazi, I would urge readers to review my investigative series published on this site.

At this point, you might ask what this has to do with our domestic financial situation and the coming collapse of the dollar. Again, we must look at the larger picture.

What is the end-game scenario?

What everyone has been witnessing, but failing to understand, is a geopolitical chess game being played by the globalist power brokers or the international central bankers. Saudi Arabia is using the assets of the U.S. military and building their pan-Islamic Kingdom on the blood and tears of our men and women. The Saudis are also instruments of the globalists, who are working overtime to implement a global currency and a world power structure.

This is the brainchild of decades and generations of planning by an elite group of people with the money and power to restructure the world. They are the members of the various societies no one wants to talk about or no one wants to admit exist. Their seat of power is located in a single square mile in London. They control the wealth of the globe.

For them to be able to complete their plan of global governance, the United States must cease to exist as a Constitutional Republic and a viable military force. Since these elites cannot do it by military might, they have planned and plotted, for at least a generation, to infiltrate our government with their own. If that sounds too outlandish to accept, then look at the many events over the last century. Our President is Barack Hussein Obama, a man who has yet to prove his Constitutional eligibility (and no one in Congress is willing to press the issue). We have an impotent Congress, stacked federal courts, and a draconian Homeland Security apparatus that appears to be gearing up for war. Against who?

We are witnessing the end-game scenario beginning to play out. An expedient method to collapse the U.S. dollar would be to interrupt (or even threaten to interrupt) the free flow of oil without having the ability to drill and refine domestically. Since the only commodity holding up the dollar is oil, what would that do to our domestic economy?

Considering this condition has existed through multiple administrations, does this not indicate some complicity by Obama’s predecessors, simply by the continuity of agenda? What about the press? They have been absent and impotent as well, failing to dig deep into these issues. Instead, they provide sound bites and just enough truth to thinly veil the lies it covers.

A financial collapse would certainly result in a societal collapse, at which point we would see violence across the country within days. Our food supply would be interrupted, and stores would be emptied in hours. Before stability can be restored, many will die. Those who have not been fooled by the agenda of the globalists will personally experience the reason why our domestic security force (known as the Department of Homeland Security) has been buying ammunition and weapons, and hardening their assets.

Meanwhile, there is an aggressive push to shred the Constitution and disarm law-abiding American citizens. The obedient, lapdog media is complicit in this as well, redefining the purpose of the Second Amendment to a mind-numbed public.

The confluence of events we are witnessing (from gun control to our foreign policies) is not by accident, but is the result of much planning. To those with discernment, the collapse of the dollar is one part of a larger plan of global governance. The lives lost within America will be collateral damage welcomed by the evil and insidious.

It’s not if but when.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

The warning signs of a tyrannical takeover of our Constitutional Republic have been flashing red for some time now and are reaching a fever pitch. Despite the flashing signs, the clamor of the alarms, and the cries of the watchmen, most Americans of this era remain in denial or have been rendered intellectually catatonic by busily chasing immediate gratification in the form of the newest version of the iPhone, iPad, or whatever “i” device will satisfy their ADHD addled intellect.

Others have chosen to adhere to a normalcy bias that is continuously fed by the familiar faces and voices of political pundits who remain dedicated to the lie of the right-left, Republican-Democrat paradigm of American politics, unwilling or unable to look at the larger picture for fear of being shamed by accusations of being part of a conspiracy fringe. Instead, these pundits would rather ignore the lie and squander their ability to make a difference, to educate and inform others of the dangers of the lie they know exists.

We must realize that we are not witnessing the fundamental change of America as represented by the mindless mantra of the Obama campaign, but something much deeper, much more nefarious, and something that will not be rectified through the ballot box. As uncomfortable as it is, what we face cannot and will not wait for the next general election.

Actions have consequences, but so does inaction.

We are living in a time in history where some will rise to be held in high esteem as heroes in history books that have yet to be written, and victims who never saw their unfortunate status coming or were fooled into believing that things are not as bad as some make them out to be. The former will suffer significantly from selfless acts performed to save what previous generations have fought to preserve. At the same time, the latter will remain complicit in their cluelessness and catatonic ignorance that will be anything but blissful.

The fuse that will ignite one of the most turbulent times in American and global history has been lit and now burns with incredible speed. Its ignition is neither an accident nor does it originate from good intentions, but a deliberate act by a “deluded elite” advancing an agenda that is so breathtakingly evil that it defies all rationality.

Hanlon’s Razor does not apply

There is a familiar adage known as Hanlon’s Razor that states, “[N]ever attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” Unfortunately, too many people have chosen to believe that the events we are seeing, including all of the related consequences, are due to the incompetence of those elected and appointed to lead our nation. This is particularly evident by those who continue to purvey the defunct notion of the right-left, Republican-Democrat paradigm of American politics and the people who follow them.

The Agenda

We are not witnessing incompetence but fulfilling an agenda generations in the making. A century ago, our Republic experienced a coup in the form of a monetary takeover through the creation of the Federal Reserve, followed by a consolidation of power through the IRS. We were slowly being led into a global governance system by the same international banking cabal that exists today. Yet, too few understand the larger picture.

Over a half-century ago, Senator Joe McCarthy was vilified for trying to warn Americans that our government was being infiltrated by Communists. Much like today, his warnings went unheeded, and the infiltration of the Communist element into America thrived. History books have not only been unkind but incorrect, as we are bearing witness today to the very threat of which he warned. Documents and testimony about his findings were inexplicably removed from the national archives. Not in the 1950s but as late as the 1990s. The timing of such removal is no accident.

The Communist infiltration combined with the Islamic infiltration, the Balkanization of America through our open borders and lax immigration enforcement, and numerous other policies and practices antithetical to the survival of our Republic have been embraced and advanced by both political parties to bring us to the point we find ourselves today. We are on the verge of a civil war, exactly as warned by my source inside the DHS last spring.

This civil war is designed to divide America, soften us and ultimately destroy us from within. United, our Republic poses an insurmountable impediment to the implementation of a global society rooted in Communism and disguised as social progressivism. The methods of implementation are not secret. They are outlined partly by the Cloward-Piven strategy and well documented by Carroll Quigley, a god of the Clinton power structure. At the base of the agenda exist the Fabian Socialists, Karl Marx. Antonio Gramsci, and the Frankfort School of neo-Marxist interdisciplinary social theory.

Bitter clingers in the crosshairs

Today, we find ourselves at the precipice of a tyrannical takeover and the destruction of our Republic, best illustrated by the talk of disarming the American populace.

The assertion is that it’s for the children when, in fact, the children are being used as political capital to advance the political agenda of American disarmament, loss of liberty, sovereignty, and the rights bestowed on our Republic by God as enumerated by our Constitution.  Notice how there is a war not only against gun owners but a parallel war against the very Judeo-Christian principles on which this country was founded.

Today, we are facing a crisis of epic proportions where you must choose a side. Will you be the one who stands bravely and alone before a column of tanks, or will continue on your quest for instant gratification?

The war we face is not just about guns. It’s about our survival as a nation and the fate of our children, grandchildren, and future generations. Which side of history will you be on?

By Douglas J. Hagmann

I attended a gun show yesterday morning, just over a quarter-century after attending my first and only gun show. The first venue was located less than a mile from the current venue. Despite the passage of time, the memories of attending my first event remain surprisingly fresh in my mind. I still recall many of the people and conversations from my first event, as well as the sights, sounds and even the “feel” of that particular gun show.

Attending the event yesterday was like seeing an acquaintance I had not seen in 26 years. I’m certain you know the feeling I am attempting to describe. Perhaps it might be an old flame, someone you once worked with, or maybe even a distant relative. Over time, you retain a mental image of that person, their appearance the last time you saw them, as well as their voice and even their demeanor. You remember them the way they were the last time you saw and interacted with them. Then, you meet them again and are awestruck by their subtle and not-so-subtle changes.

In the autumn of 1986, I recall listening to gun show attendees talking with the vendors. Most of the discussions revolved around hunting in the hills of northwestern Pennsylvania, selecting the best gun for hunting deer, turkey, and other wild game. At that time, many of the attendees were talking about their previous year’s hunting exploits, comparing notes about the best hunting spots and boasting about the different ways they cooked the venison for their families.

Twenty-six years later, the conversations were as different as the atmosphere at the event. Largely absent was the talk about hunting, venison recipes, and deer stands. I observed hundreds of men (and many women) of all ages slowly walking through the aisles created by the booths of gun vendors and survival items. I mingled with as many as possible, attempting to listen to their hushed conversations. I struck up conversations with more than a dozen attendees and asked open-ended questions to assess their moods and mindsets. Like that old acquaintance not seen for over two-and-a-half decades, the changes were stark and dramatic.

“Something’s coming”

Over the course of three hours, I spoke with a total of fourteen men (attendees) and two vendors. I deliberately kept the conversations casual and the questions general. My primary questions involved asking the attendees why they were attending and if they were going to (or already had) purchased anything. I posed my questions informally, as just another person at the event.

Every person I spoke to told me they were there to buy a gun, or another gun and/or look for bargains for ammunition. With the exception of one man, every person I spoke with said they were there to look at or buy weapons and/or ammunition for self-defense. The sole exception was not really an exception at all, as he stated that he already had all he needed for self-defense and was there to purchase a more comfortable holster for concealed carry purposes.

I can best describe the mood of the people I spoke with as somber, although that might not be the best adjective to use. Pensive, perhaps, with a “somber” overlay, as if they were leaving a funeral home after paying their respects to someone they once knew. In unrelated conversations, three of the men, each appearing to be on the trailing edge of their fifth decade of life, stated that they could feel that “something’s coming,” although did not elaborate on what they felt that “something” might be.

It is here that I stress the importance that none of the people I spoke with seemed to relish the thought of meeting that “something” head-on. None were looking forward to doing battle and even exhibited a reluctance – even sadness – about having to worry about being prepared. At one point, I recall thinking that I’d seen happier people at the DMV. There was no talk of specific politics, political parties or policy, the upcoming elections, and not the least bit of discussion about race or national origins. The “something” they were feeling seemed much bigger than that, and I felt it as well. There was something very ominous in the air, and it was almost tangible.

Quiet urgency

Each of the attendees I spoke with seemed to telegraph a sense of quiet urgency. It was not what they said, but how they said things. This quiet, determined urgency was reflected in their serious, focused demeanor.

I observed five of the men purchase long guns for home defense while eight others bought additional ammunition. I lost track of the man in search of a holster, but suspect he found what he needed based on the inventory at this event. Everyone appeared to be making purchases.

From jerky to survival foods

A quarter century ago, I remembered stocking up on beef jerky from one of several vendors. Yesterday, the beef jerky booth attracted some people, but fewer than I recall. Instead, one of the larger booths was staffed by the operators of a survival store, with long-term storable foods and water purification systems stacked high and deep. Their business appeared brisk, and I watched a half-dozen people leave with large containers of emergency food.

Before leaving, I spoke with two vendors on opposite sides of the venue. Both reported brisk sales at the show as well as at their respective stores. Both said they had seen their sales of handguns, long guns, and ammunition climb rapidly over the last five years. I asked both what they thought was behind the increase in sales. One of the older men was quick with his response, stating, “well, the country has changed, and not for the better.” I then asked him when it had changed. After a brief pause of reflection, he replied, “when ‘normal’ people started waking up to the fact that we’re a country ‘out of control.’” He added that the 2001 attacks might have gotten people’s attention, but the larger threat is “something else entirely, something from within. People can feel it.”

Yesterday, I not only saw it, I felt it as well. It’s not 1986 anymore.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

There are coincidences in life, but I’ve learned not to trust many of them. This “coincidence” involves the untimely and tragic “accidental drowning” death of 46-year-old Jennifer Ann Gallagher-Pinson of Denver, Colorado, and was brought to my attention by investigative researcher and senior contributor Randy Taylor.

I initially heard about her death late last week. Still, the accounts appeared fairly straightforward, except that Jenny Gallagher-Pinson happened to be one of the key trauma nurses on duty at the University of Colorado Hospital, where the victims from the July 20, 2012, movie theater shooting were taken.  She treated many of the victims of the shooting during those early morning hours. After further research as a result of Mr. Taylor’s findings, however, the circumstances surrounding her death appear to be anything but straightforward.

A timeline of the events surrounding her death, created by a composite of several media outlets on two continents, suggests that anomalies exist with regard to the details surrounding her initial disappearance and death.


20 July 2012: Jennifer Ann Gallagher-Pinson was working in the trauma unit of the University of Colorado Hospital as victims from the movie theater shooting were brought in. She reportedly treated several of the survivors.

22 July 2012: Barack Obama visited UCH, where he met with some shooting victims and hospital staff. “Jenny” appears in a photograph standing in front of Obama.

6 August 2012 (Monday Evening): Jennifer Ann Gallagher-Pinson, her husband, Gregory, who works as a surgeon at Surgical Specialists of Colorado, their five-(5) year-old son Jack, and at least one other unidentified friend were on vacation at West Lake Okoboji in Iowa. According to at least two reports from news outlets in Ireland, Jennifer’s birthplace, and where her family resides, Jennifer and an unidentified friend reportedly took a boat out onto the lake after her husband and young son had gone to sleep.

Jennifer reportedly left the boat to swim, however, did not return. (Now, this is where the accounts become very sketchy).

7 August 2012: (Tuesday; 12:45 p.m. local time): According to the initial report, the Dickinson County Sheriff’s Office, which is the law enforcement agency that handles emergency calls for this area, reportedly received a call from a family member who a female had “gone missing.” It is important to note that a different media report places the time of the emergency call closer to noon.

At some point before the Sheriff’s department could organize a water search, a family member reportedly found the body of Jennifer Ann Gallagher-Pinson under a dock on the lake. She was pronounced dead at the scene.

8 August 2012 (6:30 a.m. local time): The Dickinson County Sheriff’s Office issued a press release of the drowning that stated Jennifer was swimming the previous evening and was reported missing the following morning.

As verified by the authors, the Dickinson County Sheriff’s office is not commenting on this matter as the investigation into the death of Jennifer Ann Gallagher-Pinson appears to be ongoing, as well as it should.

The circumstances and conflicting reports at multiple levels by various sources of the Aurora, Colorado shooting, including those outlined by this author here, have raised a number of questions that appear to be inconsistent with the official narrative of the incident. Now, there appears to be a death of a nurse who was involved with the treatment of the victims of that shooting who has also died under questionable circumstances.

One is left to wonder whether this young wife and mother might have heard or seen something at the hospital and began to ask unwelcomed questions. Perhaps the shooting and the untimely death of this woman are unrelated. In these uncertain times, however, one would be well advised to be vigilant and question everything.

Whatever the circumstances, know that our prayers and sympathies are with this young lady’s family and co-workers.

Follow Hagmann P.I.

Copyright © 2023 | All Rights Reserved.