This is one of those written pieces that couldn’t be titled until after it had been written. It is a compilation of numerous thoughts, opinions, and, yes, stating the obvious. I’m finding that stating the obvious is a term that one must use cautiously as much of the population has been reprogrammed, dumbed down, and some are simply stupid. The reprogramming has
been going on since birth, and the ‘dumbed down’ was set in motion about the time the reprogramming was initiated. The’ dumbed down’ is a sort of continuous measurement affected by people’s consumption of media, television, radio, and, yes, even podcasts.
The fundamental programming started with CNN and the 24-hour broadcasts. Reasoning, it was on 30-minute loops and became the background noise for offices, waiting rooms, television stores, and at home. I found more people had CNN on for background noise than they did radios. Anyone familiar with subliminal programming would see exactly how valuable this would be regarding programming people. It brought tons of advertising dollars for the news giants, but the real prize was the funding and favors extended to these media giants by the US Government to capture and manipulate the minds of the citizens of the planet.
This process started in the USA and went worldwide as the market for the human mind expanded. It is precisely why many governments became directly involved in setting up “state-owned media” in countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. One obvious issue would be the content pumped out 24 hours a day to an unsuspecting population. A communist government would find that after years of this repetition and subliminal seduction, the population was easier to manage and control. Even Socialist countries like Canada could manipulate the people through control of the media, that being the consumption of the “narrative, or “the agenda” of the ruling government and consumed subconsciously by the population. A person you have heard of said that if you tell the same lie enough times, people will believe it. That person was Joseph Goebbels, Chief Propagandist for the Nazi Party.
*If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Josef Goebbels
As we have witnessed continuously over the years, that formula works, and it has been effectively deployed on almost every person in the world by one government or another. Certain regions, for instance, in Africa, haven’t really experienced this for a few obvious reasons. One is the lack of the chronology, and another is the man with the AK-47 riding through the village.
Teaching Your Children to Be Free Thinkers
In our household, we don’t often watch the legacy news when children are present. When we do, it’s minimal and selective. As parents, we ensure that we answer any of the children’s questions about the news immediately. This is critical as you can see the struggle, the fight between parents, schools (the government) for the minds of our children. Sadly, too many parents have relinquished control of their children to the government and do not realize what they have done.
A simple test to see if you have lost control is to ask your child a simple question about any CURRENT subject matter, say sexuality, for instance, shut up and let the child tell you what they know about it without interrupting them. When they are finished, you evaluate what was just said. Surprise! You may be in for a shocker. Parents often get too busy to do this simple test.
Parents get too busy to make sure that everyone meets around the dinner table at least twice a week. You might be honest with yourself and consider whether this simple problem solver is in play with your kids at home. The only way to fix a problem is first to acknowledge that there is a problem. You are not doing your job if you are not reviewing and approving your children’s knowledge intake. You are not raising your children. Someone else is, and that instrument of learning is evil, corrupt, and trying to take your child from you, mentally now but will ultimately become physical someday.
The purveyors of these evil doctrines are going after younger and younger victims.
It used to be that most of the Liberal Left mindset was being implanted into the young ones in colleges or universities, and it was painfully obvious. The left, the preachers, and teachers of alternatives to sexuality, government, capitalism, right and wrong would slowly reprogram children to their way of thinking in four short years. This was easy to do especially with the children who lacked a solid belief system instilled into them at a young age and through their development years. Now they are going after the children K-12 with their alternative and evil thinking.
I never thought I would see transsexuals, crossdressers, and groomers being allowed access to grade school and high school children to perform their sick, sexually perverted ideology in front of kids. Even worse are the school administrators and board members who, on behalf of parents, entrusted their children to these sexual deviants and perverts. The administrators, board members, principals, and teachers who endorse and allow this should all be arrested and jailed. The parents who enable and support this should have their kids removed from their homes as they are not fit to be parents.
Before some disturbed leftist starts screaming that I am a racist or biased against homosexuals, I’ll set the record straight – I am not. I have nothing against homosexuals, provided they aren’t trying to elevate themselves higher than anyone else in the social system, which means suppressing or trampling someone else’s rights to improve their self-perceived social standing and rights.
Everyone is equal. People that throw the word “racist” around in these discussions are ignorant, as this has nothing to do with race. If you are a homosexual, that’s your business. Do not make it mine. There is no bigotry here, folks. Pride is not limited to gay or bisexual people. Heterosexual people have a right to take pride in their sexuality as well, especially when challenged about their sexuality. This sexual discussion has no business in public and rarely in social settings unless everyone there is comfortable with this level of disclosure. For some people, it is uncomfortable to discuss, which should also be respected. The old rule was never discuss religion or politics in any social setting. Truthfully, discussions about sexuality should probably be added to that list.
That said, I am very much against groomers, people that sexually exploit children, perverts that expose themselves to children, pedophiles, people that support any of these types mentioned, and irresponsible parents and other adults that allow it. I trust I’m clear on this.
These types of sexually deviant practices have no business around children. Waving one’s penis in a child’s face is wholly unacceptable, and any parent that challenges this or takes action against these perverts and the people that endorse this deviancy is, in my humble opinion, 100 percent within their rights to remedy the situation to a point where the problem will not reoccur. These are our children, not the government’s children. If I’m on the jury, you will be going home to your children. Period. End of story.
To tie all of this together and to show how this deviant type of behavior becomes accepted or ignored, you will note that the media had to jump right in the middle of this now public discussion and, even worse, force their narrative on everyone, on every channel, 24 hours a day.
This is a subject that joins a growing list of FASCISM IN MOTION topics such as COVID, Climate Change, CO2 emissions, fossil fuels, immigration, all issues where you have FASCIST GOVERNMENTS telling you who you will accept and not accept, behaviors that you are told to accept and which ones you will not accept, which political opinions are acceptable and which are not permitted, what will be distributed in the media and what will be rejected, often against your God-given belief system.
You are being told and controlled on what you will eat and will not eat. What types of vehicles you will drive, and which ones you will not be allowed to even own. Whether your appliances are gas or electric, although both fuel sources are readily available. Government censorship, threats against your “Social Credit Score” for having an opposing opinion. Government has content control over free speech on the television and the Internet.
And the strangest thing is the fact that the ones accusing us of Fascism, are actually the fascists themselves.
Be Safe. Stay Vigilant.
July 15, 2023
By Douglas J. Hagmann
While in police custody, the suspect Holmes did not appear to present any threat to police, who were able to converse with him in a normal manner. They did not transmit any communications that would suggest that he was acting aggressively, was overtly threatening or “insane.”
Holmes was reportedly “captured” by police at his vehicle, although he made no attempts to escape, nor was he aggressive or threatening to the police. He was identified by his attire and possession of weapons or weapons near his person. He was not identified by witnesses to the extent the surviving witnesses saw his face or even the bright color of his dyed hair.
It is relevant to insert here that throughout history, most of the perpetrators in “active shooter scenarios” has either been killed by police or killed themselves. For example, the August 1, 1966 shooting rampage by Charles Whitman, who killed a total of 14 people and wounded 32 others at and near the University of Texas when he began shooting people from the university’s tower was shot on the scene by police.
The mass shooting at the McDonald’s restaurant on July 18, 1984, nearly 28 years to the day from the Aurora shooting, left 21 people, including 5 young children, dead and 19 others injured. The shooter, identified as James Huberty, was shot by police inside the restaurant.
There are many other such instances, yet there are exceptions as well. Notable examples include Sirhan Sirhan, who was convicted of the shooting death of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter who killed 6 people (including U.S. District Court Judge John Roll) and wounded another 14 (including U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords) in January, 2011.
Dr. Randall Strandquist, a licensed forensic psychologist, offered interesting analysis and commentary about the behavior of suspect James Holmes.
The public has many questions about James Holmes: Was he wasted on drugs? Was/is he crazy, like schizophrenia? Is he/has he been faking mental illness? Not having the ability to evaluate James Holmes or review police reports I can only offer my opinion based on the data available and my experience. There are no data from police communications available that indicate James Holmes appeared wasted or crazy when initially detained. The communications indicate that the commanding officer wanted to make sure that he was detained, indicating that he likely did not appear as the shooter (decked out in body armor, touting guns).
One of the detaining officers reported that James Holmes claimed he was alone (which may or may not have been true) but the officer did not believe him, based on reports from eye witnesses describing the shooter. The fact that the officer’s inclination is to believe James Holmes is lying gives us information about James Holmes’ presentation at the time. James Holmes appeared to have the cognitive ability to communicate sufficiently and respond accurately to the detaining officer’s questions. The officer appears to find no indication of cognitive impairment and that James Holmes understands the questions asked of him. Again, these are my conjectures, based on limited information and lack thereof.
The next report we get, as far as I know, is the jailers reporting that he is acting incoherent manner, flopping in his cell, spitting everywhere, and talking about the Batman movie. They said they forced him to wear a spit mask, for the protection of the correctional officers (or anyone else) interacting with him. There were reports that he initially told officers he was “The Joker” but it appears that his condition had significantly decompensated from the time he was initially detained.
The first time we see James Holmes (other than a college photo and the mug shot) was in the courtroom, this is presentation number three. (I find it interesting that, considering the theater had cameras in the front, the interior and the back of the facility, we still have seen no film of James Holmes’ entrance or his detainment). When I saw his demeanor and facial expressions, my first thought was, “This guy’s mind is wasted.” His demeanor and expressions appear inconsistent with an individual with whom you would be able to have productive communication. I have no information to even conjecture as to the reason for his presentation on that day. I will say that if he were faking, he’s pretty sophisticated. Typically, individuals who are faking mental illness go for the typical Hollywood presentation. For example, sudden jerks of the head and laughing, as if they’re hearing voices or seeing things. That was not what I saw.
Presentation number four is that James Holmes is reportedly coherent, complaining about the food and reporting that he has no memory for the incidents which led to his arrest. In cases where malingering is considered, amnesia is an unsophisticated attempt in pursuit of being acquitted of charges based on a mental illness. There are no reports of a continued need for a spit mask and no reports of him thinking he is acting out a part in a movie.
Four different presentations within a short period of time is atypical of a malingerer. Typically the individual will claim to have certain symptoms and stick with that. They may increase the intensity of the symptoms or add more on, if they think that the evaluator isn’t buying the “crazy card” they’re trying to play. In this case, James Holmes appears to go from relatively cognizant, to incoherent, to coherent. Not a typical pattern of an individual facing the death penalty and trying to get off as insane.
It would be my opinion, with the limited data I have, that this presentation would be more consistent with someone coming off of mind-altering drugs, than someone trying to fake a mental illness. I will conclude by stating that these are only conjectures, based on limited data, and all possible causes considered (including some not mentioned) are possible.
To anyone who read the first part of this report of the Aurora shooting, it should be clear that there are serious questions pertaining to the information thus far disclosed to the public. It is unlikely that answers to legitimate questions will not be forthcoming, considering that Judge William Blair Sylvester issued an order on the very the day of the shooting to seal all investigative records and documents pertaining to this case. Not only have the investigative documents been sealed, but also sealed is the complete list of court filings.
There are legitimate reasons for sealing records and reports, but taking the extra step to seal the list of court filings themselves raises even more questions about the areas of potential interest, most likely to the defense. Ostensibly, the disclosure of the court records would be “contrary to public interest,” according to the judge. How so?
History has illustrated cases where public reports, when compared to actual facts, are significantly different. One of the most striking examples of this difference in a high-profile murder is the case of Sirhan Sirhan and the shooting death of U.S. senator and presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy. Having interviewed Rose Lynn Mangan, the indefatigable investigative researcher of the RFK assassination on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, it is evident that things are not as they always appear, or as we are told.
I asked forensic psychologist Dr. Randall Strandquist about mind control and hypnosis, a subject I viewed with a great amount of distrust until I saw a stage act in Las Vegas many years ago that involved audience participation. I’ll spare the details, but I became convinced on that day that mind control is very possible. Given the odd behavior of the suspect, I broached the subject with Dr. Strandquist. What follows is his response.
Another possibility frequently discussed on many internet sites is, “Is this guy a mind-control/Manchurian candidate?” Uh, oh, here we go, break out your tinfoil hats…this guy is actually going to consider this? Yes. Now, let’s look at this reasonably. First issue: Can the mind be controlled? Answer: Yes. A simple example of this would be hypnosis. Some people are more vulnerable or easily hypnotizable than others. Another example is called NLP, or NeuroLinguistic Programming. Simply by altering how one communicates, can alter/influence/control an individual. For an example of this, search “Derren Brown” on you tube. One of my favorites is when he goes to the racetrack and convinces the cashiers that a losing ticket is actually a winning ticket. A final example is one that is the most prominent, one that most of us are exposed to on a daily basis, that is television. It is my understanding that just by watching television, it alters your brain waves. There’s a reason why the television line-up is called “programming” folks.
What about the Manchurian Candidate stuff, when a person is allegedly programmed to respond in a certain manner after being prompted by a certain phrase or sensory experience. From the psychological perspective, this would be called a “dissociative episode.” This is when a person splits from their normal reality into another, be it via personality or perceptual experience. Dissociation happens to all of us. On a very basic level, it’s called daydreaming, we find our minds wandering from what we had been focusing upon but then snap out of it. Another example is when traveling down the highway and you realize that a few exits have gone by and you don’t recall passing them. It happens. Whether you believe in multiple personalities is up to you, but you need to understand that the brain has the capability to switch off, so to speak, while your body is still operating.
Is there an organization out there creating Manchurian Candidates? According to the Church hearings, the CIA performed mind control experiments on many individuals. This became to be known as the MK Ultra project. Ewing Cameron, in a Canadian psychiatric facility, performed these experiments for the CIA. This is documented, folks. A few of the patients/victims of Cameron sued and WON. What they learned from these experiments, I don’t know for fact. The CIA claims that this type of experimentation no longer occurs, but the fact is that it did, at one time, occur.
Is it still occurring? Reportedly, James Holmes’ father, Dr. Robert Holmes, worked for a company named HNC, which contracted research with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). I don’t know for fact what Dr. R. Holmes did for them, but there is a connection. James Holmes, at the age of 18, was a research intern at the Salk Institute, participating in research regarding enhancing certain chemicals of the brain to increase the endurance of a soldier and prevent combat fatigue. (By the way, folks, when I was 18, I was washing dishes in the school cafeteria, trying to put myself through undergrad. This guy, Homes, was no slack, he was cream of the crop in the scientific braino’s camp). There are reports that indicate James Holmes, during this internship, worked on something called “Flicker Fusion” and how it can manipulate/control the mind. Later, at a science camp, James Holmes identified his mentor as John Jacobson. He did this during his presentation on “temporal illusions” when he was reviewing the data on how to “manipulate temporal order” such that sensory experiences originate in the mind rather than from the environment. In other words, manipulate such that you could create any world/reality for an individual.
I am not saying that James Holmes was a Manchurian candidate. I’m not saying he wasn’t. But there appears to be evidence that research into the mind continues, some of that involving mind control, and mind manipulation. To dismiss this as a possibility is naive, in my opinion. Most people do not want to perceive themselves as “vulnerable” to such manipulation. We want to believe that we have complete control over our minds and no one can take that. We want to believe that everyone out there is benevolent and no organization out there would be doing things like creating Manchurian candidates to do evil. I’m not going to tell you what to believe. I do not claim to know what went on with James Holmes. Keep in mind that there does not appear to be any evidence that he committed the shootings, just that he was standing outside the theater by his car when police arrived. I have not heard any quotations that he admitted to doing the shooting, just that he was alone. There is no indication from the dispatch recordings that he reported his apartment was rigged with explosives, at least prior to 4:00 a.m. The fact is, folks, we don’t know all the details of what went down that night, and we may never, despite what the talking heads tell us while we watch the nightly programming.
Speaking earlier of Las Vegas, it is a good bet that in the case of James Holmes, answers to legitimate questions will not be forthcoming. We’ve asked ourselves whether this analysis of the Aurora shooting is an attempt to make sense out of a senseless, random act. After all, we’ve been told that Lee Harvey Oswald is the lone shooter in the JFK assassination, and attempts to paint that as a larger conspiracy is a natural human response in attempt to rationalize a random, senseless act.
Could it be that the entire scenario is as simple as one guy going off his nut? While it’s possible, there are enough oddities within this event that suggest it isn’t quite that simple. Accordingly, we will continue to ask questions, and probe into the events surrounding this incident to expose the truth, wherever it leads.
