I’ve written several reports about a very specific case making its way through the US court system – Missouri v. Biden, et al, and the facts that are being uncovered that the government, legacy media, and social media platforms don’t want you to know.
See Government Censorship & Fauci Lies Documented in Latest Missouri et al. vs. Biden et al. Filing.
As reported by Tracy Beanz in an article titled The Lead Up to the Hearing: Missouri v. Biden, [t]he complaint alleged that the US Government was not only threatening and coercing social media companies to censor Americans on social media, but they were also working WITH social media companies to accomplish that goal.
Read more of Tracy Beanz stellar reporting here: Bombshell Court Order Outlines Proven Government/Big Tech Censorship.
Without fear of overstating the importance of the case, this is one of the most important civil liberties cases in American history.
READ / DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL FILING:
CISA and the FBI worked together to censor the Biden laptop story. NIAID and NIH conspired to censor the lab leak theory and the Great Barrington Declaration. NIAID is embedded in White House censorship activities. CISA and GEC coordinate with each other and with NGOs like the Election Integrity Project-
This isn’t a guess. They have the evidence. This happened.
And if you thought it stopped with just agencies, you would be wrong—high-level congressional staffers coordinated with the FBI and social media in secret meetings. The partnership between the White House and Congress gives coercive force to the censorship activities, and there are texts to prove it.
Tracy Beanz – Uncover DC
Read it all HERE
The three architects of nation destruction, the “Butchers of Benghazi,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power, with Barack Hussein Obama at the helm, deliberately and ruthlessly destabilized Libya as part of the “Arab Spring” realignment of power that included Egypt, the Middle East and across North Africa. Recall that Clinton was the primary architect behind the weapons running operation out of the Department of State CIA compound in Benghazi when it was attacked and overrun on September 11-12, 2012, causing the death of a US ambassador and at least three US citizens (US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens; USFS officer Sean Smith; CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty). Remember their names.
As Obama began to reshape the balance of power in the Middle East and North Africa, he signed Executive Order 13566 on February 25, 2011 – about 18 months before the Benghazi attack. That EO cited “[A] national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701‑1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions of Colonel Muammar Qadhafi…”
Today, Biden extended the “national emergency” by extending Executive Order 13726, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13566.
“The situation in Libya continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and measures are needed to protect against the diversion of assets or other abuses by members of Qadhafi’s family, their associates, and other persons hindering Libyan national reconciliation.“
Link to White House Executive Order extension HERE.
It should be obvious who is running the White House, and it’s not Biden.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
It is one of the most, if not the most underreported, misreported and mischaracterized story in recent history.
An official investigation conducted by law enforcement officials have concluded that the document known as the Certificate of Live Birth of U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama II, uploaded to and published on the White House website on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document. It is a digitally manufactured forgery.https://www.youtube.com/embed/xyQmqHcjhew
That is the official and final conclusion of a five-year long investigation performed by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, using the expert analysis of a certified document examiner based in Hawaii and a digital forensics laboratory located in Europe. The findings of this investigation were detailed by lead investigator Mike Zullo under the direction of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in a press conference held on December 15, 2016. Additional details were provided in a subsequent two-hour interview with lead investigator Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups on The Hagmann Report the following day.
Due to the swirl of confusion and often mind-numbing mischaracterizations of the facts of this issue and the nature of the investigation, it is critically important to understand with precision exactly what has been addressed and ultimately determined by this investigation. Only then will the profound and disturbing implications be fully understood, and the magnitude of this issue be realized.
In August of 2011, approximately 250 members of the Surprise, Arizona TEA Party petitioned the Maricopa County Office of the Sheriff to investigate the document uploaded to the White House website that was represented to be the official long form birth certificate of U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama II. Sheriff Joe Arpaio accepted their petition and assigned this matter to Mike Zullo to head the investigation.
The investigation was limited in nature and scope to simply verify the legitimacy and authenticity of the federal identification document that resides on the “White House-dot-gov” website– nothing more and nothing less.
The investigation was never about where Barack Hussein Obama II was born, his parental lineage, or other extraneous issues relating to his Constitutional eligibility to hold office. Again, the investigation was deliberately narrow and focused on the document itself.
Unfortunately, many within and outside of the media created unnecessary confusion about this investigative task from the outset. The confusion soon turned to controversy to such an extent that the true intent and purpose was obfuscated and publicly misrepresented, which frequently resulted in obstructing the investigation itself.
According to lead investigator Mike Zullo, he initially expected the investigation to be relatively quick and easily accomplished. After all, the White House uploaded the document and presented it as an authentic representation of the original document on file at the Hawaii Department of Health, so what could possibly go wrong?
All that was required was verification that the document presented by the White House and published on the White House website was a true and accurate copy of the original on file in Hawaii. It seemed simple enough. What he encountered, however, was anything but simple.
At the direction of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, lead investigator Mike Zullo opened the investigation like any other assignment, and began making official inquiries as a commissioned law enforcement officer with the authority to act in that capacity. Despite the musings of many people who believed, from the beginning, that the document was a forgery, he made no such assumptions. Consistent with standard and accepted investigative practices, Mike Zullo let the evidence developed set the direction of the investigation.
The events that took place from the first investigative steps taken by Mike Zullo and the Cold Case Posse through the present, the obfuscation and obstruction encountered by government officials, the multiple misrepresentations made by the media, the harassment he and others endured, and many other incidents that took place in his investigative journey could fill a book – a long book.
In relatively short order, Mike Zullo determined that the document published by the White House contained significant inconsistencies that could not be explained away by the innocuous handling of the document. Despite the many assertions of numerous self-proclaimed experts that the troubling artifacts contained in the long form birth certificate of a U.S. President could be explained by various nuances of PDF layering, copier quirks or other innocent means, Mike Zullo possessed evidence to the contrary. However, he was limited with respect to what he could publicly divulge or risk compromising the integrity of his investigation.
As preserving the integrity of the evidence was paramount, Mike Zullo could not reveal many of his findings that needed additional substantiation in order to have an air-tight, “courtroom-ready” case. This, of course led many uninformed, misinformed and even misguided people to doubt the existence of any such evidence, and fed the media frenzy in their attacks against Zullo and his investigation. The attacks even began coming from those who were supposedly on the side of truth.
As the investigation progressed, Mike Zullo and those working the case with him knew what they had discovered and possessed: Evidence that the Obama long form birth certificate was a forged document. He has prima facie evidence to support such findings.
Mike Zullo also knew what they needed: The incontrovertible, bullet-proof process by which the document was created. Not a method that could closely resemble the process or end result, but the exact method used that could be replicated in court and convince a jury. The “how.”
Mike Zullo admitted that the investigation had taken quite a toll during this five-year period. He confided to Carl Gallups, his friend and a former law enforcement officer himself (and one who publicly covered this investigation), that he was ready to throw in the towel on more than one occasion. The ad hominem attacks by the media, politicians, and even more troubling, by his supposed friends and allies due to the rampant mischaracterizations of his investigation was becoming oppressive.
Meanwhile, Mike Zullo continued his tenacious investigation and research, searching for the key to unlock the methods employed to create the forged document. He had already made the case for forgery, but still needed to identify the exact means used. As the 2016 election saw the defeat of incumbent Sheriff Joe Arpaio by his Soros-backed opponent, he was also running out of time to do so.
It was only within the last several weeks that the needed breakthrough was realized. The process by which the forged document was created was identified and precisely replicated. The findings were the result of the individual and combined efforts of Reed Hayes, a certified questioned document examiner from Hawaii, a digital forensic examiner from Italy-based Forlab, a multimedia forensics laboratory, and Mike Zullo’s videographer who had been assisting him on the video compilations for presentation.
With little time to spare, the needed information was finally identified. It can now be officially stated with absolute certainty that the document that resides on the White House website purported to be Obama’s true “Certificate of Live Birth” is a manufactured forgery.
Of course, there is more.
This preliminary report merely provides the necessary context for the evidence found and addresses the misinformation that has plagued this investigation from the start.
In my forthcoming reports, I will provide the information that can be publicly shared, courtesy of lead investigator Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups, the latter who has been involved in the proper public disclosure of the facts of this case, as well as others.
Undoubtedly, there will be many people who will ask, why now? The answer is simple and has already been addressed, but it bears repeating. This investigation was not driven by any political agenda, but by the timing of the evidence developed. Mike Zullo held true to the investigative concept of letting the evidence direct the investigation, however long it might take.
Notably, though, this investigation was impeded by individuals in positions of power and further obfuscated by the corporate media. To be clear, this investigation was never about the birthplace or parental lineage of Barack Hussein Obama II. It was always about the authenticity of the federal identifying document of Obama. And that document has been identified as a manufactured forgery.
As stated by both Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo, the information is new, the implications are profound and equally disturbing. Stay tuned.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
An article written by Coach Dave Daubenmire, titled ‘Is the Man in the White House Mentally Ill?’ appeared on the News with Views website last week. Coach Daubenmire said it best, plainly and directly just within the title alone. With all due respect to the coach, however, I’d bet most “average” Americans looked at the title of the column and proceeded elsewhere, believing the article to be the ravings of just some hyper-lunatic Christian conservative with latent hatred toward the man occupying the Oval Office.
I’d even bet that some conservatives and even conservative-Christians felt that way too, even without reading the article. After all, there must be some expectations of respect, or standards thereto, for anyone holding the position of the office of the President of the United States.
Furthermore, anyone of reasonable sensibilities would most certainly dismiss the mere suggestion that the most powerful man in the free world might possess some form of mental impairment, wouldn’t they? After all, how could our government remain functional and the chief executive be respected by other world leaders if he is hobbled by a hidden mental impairment?
Unsurprisingly, too few appear to be taking the observations of Coach Daubenmire seriously, including the corporate media and the usual stable of stale political pundits with a keyboard or microphone. Sure, some within the controlled media have broken from their scripts and made some minimal commentaries, but nothing of substance. The “real media,” however, would never look at the recent actions and reactions (specifically to the mid-term election results, as merely one example) of Barack Hussein Obama II with such unprecedented disrespect.
Wait… did I just use the word “unprecedented?” Hold onto that thought just for a moment.
The ponderings of Coach Daubenmire include his association between Obama’s visible behaviors with the use of a bona fide medical disorder known as Antisocial Personality Disorder, otherwise known as Sociopathy. The coach points to various instances where Obama exhibited outward signs of this recognized disorder, particularly in recent months. He lists the clinical presentations of someone with Antisocial Personality Disorder, but does so in plain-speak through his use of the medically recognized term sociopath. And such plain-speak and candor, cutting though the medical jargon to get to the heart of the matter, ladies and gentlemen, has seemed to cause some people to dismiss the valuable insights contained within his article, or has caused outrage in others.
Since the political and social Liberals (read Marxists) claim to have empathy for those with various impairments, as demonstrated by their rabid allegiance to the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) at all costs and justifying the means by the ends, then it should be equally reasonable for those on the political left to be concerned about the mental and physical state of their leader. Instead they choose to conveniently look the other way despite textbook behavioral exhibitions to the contrary. Even worse, they assail anyone who points out how closely the behavior of Barack Hussein Obama II mirrors the characteristics of a sociopath. Has the media’s reticence to report on potential mental impairments with our chief executive officers always been the case? No.
It is here that you can turn back to the word “unprecedented.” It was not that long ago when the corporate media publicly mused about U.S. President Ronald Reagan suffering from Alzheimer’s, especially after Mr. Reagan was officially diagnosed with the disease. It was apparently permissible for the Liberal political pundits to suggestively allege that Reagan was afflicted by this horrific disease during his second term, as illustrated by ABC News and in a very unflattering manner in the popular website Slate.
Earlier U.S. history was even less kind to other presidents, both contemporaneously and historically.
As detailed by the website HealthCentral in an article published in February of 2012, the author writes:
“In 2006 an article was published by psychiatrists at the Duke University Medical Center which reviewed the biographies of American presidents from 1776 to 1974. This study, which was published in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease analyzed the historical data of 37 presidents looking for symptoms of mental illness as defined by the criteria of the DSM-IV, the Diagnostic Statistical Manual.”
The article pointed to seven-(7) presidents who were known to be, or were alleged to have been impaired by clinical depression. Citing the original study, the author notes that the job performance of many of the U.S. Presidents identified in this study was adversely affected by their mental illnesses. But those were much simpler times, when the fate of the world did not rest with the mental acuity of one man.
As shown, there is indeed precedent and ample examples for the media and public to openly and directly question the mental state of our statesmen. Exception appears only to apply to this president, despite such clinical presentations that could be exponentially more devastating to the state of our country than at any other time in American history. Again, much more is at stake.
Before Coach Daubenmire’s most succinct article about Obama, there was an extensive article published in September of 2008 by Ali Sina titled Understanding Obama: The Making of a Fuehrer. Ali Sina provides a valuable perspective into not only the mind of then-Senator Obama through his political actions, speeches and machinations, but from his own most valuable life experiences as an Iranian Ex-Muslim. More than six years after it was published, that article continues to stand on its own merits. The insight into the actions of Obama have been borne out in the years since it was written, and should still be spread far and wide for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
So, we were warned in 2008 about Obama’s narcissism and other tyrannical traits he exhibited by Ali Sina, yet those warnings were all but ignored and discarded as hyperbole. Read the article again, this time with the benefit of six years of experience in your rear view mirror.
Also, combine Sina’s warnings with the ever-growing reports of harassment and intimidation of media personalities who refuse to simply “be reasonable” by agreeing to merely regurgitate Obama’s sound bites without question. Is it all starting to make more sense now?
We were warned in 2008 by the life experiences of Ali Sina. Today, we are being warned by Coach Daubenmire through the lens of his own life experience that something is very wrong with Obama. Very wrong. Most can see it, but few have the courage to report it. Even fewer have the ability to lay it all out in plain English like the coach.
The problem is growing. It is becoming more obvious. As in the case of all clinical sociopathic behavior, the man is becoming increasingly more dangerous. The stakes are greater today than at any other time in recent U.S. history. This is no time to dodge the difficult questions or exercising reluctance to demand answers. We had that time once, but it was squandered away by the potential and actual accusations of bigotry and racism. It was squandered away by partisan politics, and facilitated through the mega microphones of not just the liberal left, but by those purported conservatives who allegedly stood for righteousness, integrity and character.
A lot more damage to our country can, and will, be done during the next two years. If you’re relying on the change of congressional leadership to act as a stop-gap measure against this Oval Office occupant, let me ask you one question. From the vantage point of recent American history, how did that work for you and for our country?
Sadly, and despite all assertions to the contrary, we know very little about the man seated in the Oval Office. We don’t even know his real legal name. Do you think that’s untrue? A myth? Well, produce the authenticated paper document trail from his Certificate of Live Birth to his legal name change from Soetoro to Obama, and all other relevant documents that will once and for all put any nagging rumors to rest. Produce his school records, including any and all financial aid documents, and allow them to be properly analyzed.
As I have asserted for the last six years, his life is a lie. It’s the artifact of a legend created for this period in our history. Attempts to officially penetrate the iron curtain of lies have been rejected by both parties and supported by a corrupted and compromised media. It’s gotten so bad most people cannot even tell when they are being lied to, and even then, most choose not to believe it.
Don’t dismiss the obvious. It’s time that we get back to talking like mature adults and asking unpopular questions that few seem to want to ask in a manner that we can all understand.
About Obama, the coach said it best. “I believe he is a sick, dangerous man.” I totally agree, coach, but permit me to add one thing. He is a man whose past is hidden from inspection by handlers with a much different agenda than the “average” American reading your column or mine. He is not just a danger, but a danger wrapped in a complex enigma of lies.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
The current threats posed by ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, to world stability in general and to the U.S. specifically are very real and extremely dangerous. However, the origins of the group and hence the threats are not to be believed “as advertised.” We are being subjected to more lies from the White House to Foggy Bottom, along with many elected leaders who know the real story but insist upon pushing a false narrative.
Collectively, they are bringing us to the brink of World War III through Syria, which I have long contended, while simultaneously opening our country to a large scale attack that could equal the September 11, 2001 attacks. Unlike 9/11, however, we know at least part of their strategy.
First, ISIS did not mysteriously or unexpectedly originate from vaporous pockets of Islamic terrorists in an area that is referred to as the Levant, or the geographical region roughly bounded by southern Turkey to the north, Egypt to the south, the Mediterranean to the west and Iraq to the East.¬† No, ISIS was created through an intentional process of deliberate default by the U.S. and Western powers—including Israel, working in conjunction if not on behalf of the Saudis, Kuwait and Qatar. This unconventional alliance will be addressed later, but for now, it must be identified to understand the truly dangerous and evil confederation of complicity.
To understand the present, we must identify—and fully comprehend—the importance of certain pivotal events that brought us to this point. As the first decade of the 21st century, consumed by the Bush years of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq was coming to a close, elements of Western and Saudi intelligence were deeply involved in orchestrating what is now known as the Arab Spring. As these plans were being laid, the process to select a new U.S. President was in progress. Specifically, the selection of the democratic nominee between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama was at issue.
Given the requirements needed to accomplish such an ambitious objective as reshaping the power structure of the entire Middle East, it is relevant to cite the “odd meeting” that occurred during the Biderberg Conference in Chantilly, Virginia, attended by Obama and Clinton, almost a year to the day (or exactly one calendar year if you use the starting and end dates) before Obama’s infamously important Cairo speech. It was on June 5, 2008 that Obama and Clinton went out of their way to ditch the press and sneak off to the Westfields Marriott Hotel in Chantilly where Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and other globalist leaders were meeting at the Bilderberg conference. Shortly thereafter, it was Obama who was selected as the democratic nominee and ultimately, the next leader of the United States. A wise selection, perhaps, considering the globalist plans as detailed herein.
Whatever happened at that secret meeting, Obama was ultimately named as the 44th President of the United States, and Hillary Clinton was appointed as his Secretary of State.
From the very outset of the Obama foreign policy agenda, the intent to reshape the power structure of the Middle East was telegraphed to the world, but few understood the far reaching and world changing implications of this policy. On June 4, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama delivered his “New Beginnings” speech at Cairo University as referenced above. Perhaps the new restructuring of power within the Middle East was discussed at the ranch of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, located outside Riyadh, where he spent the night on his way to Cairo. From that point forward, it became increasingly obvious that the Saudi agenda was pushing America’s foreign, strategic and even military agenda throughout the Middle East. Obama’s bow to the Saudi king was deep, all we saw was his bony posterior protuberance, which is a lesson in political, or globalist perspective.
At the risk of appearing to digress, it is nonetheless important to revisit the controversy surrounding the legend of the man who is known as Barack Hussein Obama. We should recall the influence of the Saudis over Obama, from his college years to his presidential campaign. Was it not Saudi influence that paved his way into higher academia? During his campaign where he seemed to be cash poor, was there not controversy surrounding the contributions made to his campaign through anonymous internet donations, made possible through the campaign’s failure to adhere to standard protections against fraudulent and illegal giving? Suddenly, Obama had funds to carry him through the election cycle, many thousands untraceable to their origin but seemingly originating from overseas and in particular, Saudi Arabia.
Let’s also recall that the controversy surrounding the background and Constitutional eligibility of Obama remains at issue. The long form Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) still lacks the proper authentication to pass for legitimate documentation, and the person responsible for its origination was mysteriously the only fatality of nine occupants of a small plane that made a water landing off the coast of Hawaii last year. That’s quite a coincidence.
The truth, at least from my vantage point as a veteran investigator experienced in background investigations of top executives to hold their positions in Fortune 500 companies, the man known as Barack Hussein Obama has failed to furnish any authenticated proof of his Constitutional eligibility to hold office. Contrary to the corporate media, this issue has never been resolved in any court. This raises not merely a point of law, but the subject of allegiance. Look at the world today and ask yourself whether the commissions or omissions of Obama have benefitted the United States. If not, who or what nation appears to be the primary beneficiary of his agenda?
Much like the secret meeting in Chantilly where it would appear that critical decisions were made outside of the public’s purview and in violation of the Logan Act, it appears that there is a hidden power structure behind this particular man, and a concurrent shield of protection by the media to avoid any meaningful probes of his background. To mention any such things, however, is to be shunned, ostracized, and vilified.
It strains credulity that the most powerful intelligence apparatus in the world didn’t see the formation of ISIS coming. The closer one looks, the more that can be seen in the creation of this nebulous entity that is unrestricted by borders, which is a very important and significant characteristic of this threat. ISIS was created by design, with the full knowledge of those in power.
As the world watched the transformation of power in the Middle East through what is referred to as the Arab Spring, American intelligence assets landed on the shores of Libya. The landing contingent included U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was previously involved in diplomatic relations with Syria. Shortly thereafter and with the help of U.S. and other Western and Saudi intelligence assets, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, a now pliant and co-operating ally against terrorists, became the next victim of this U.S.-Saudi led agenda. Hillary Rodham Clinton accepted the news with shameful and unstatesman-like giddiness. In Libya, with Gaddafi removed and his son imprisoned, the U.S., with the aid of the British, French, Saudis, Qataris and others, established the largest CIA logistics center in Benghazi to ship arms and fighters across North Africa to Syria via Turkey.
While Michael Reagan was perhaps the first to write about this illegal covert arms operation in his column Building on a kernel of truth, I have authored more than four dozen reports on the role of Benghazi and the road to World War III. It is Benghazi where the truth must win out to prevent us from entering our death race to Damascus, or the beginning of World War III. To date, everyone has been misdirected, or intentionally directed to the “red herring” of diplomatic security as the proximate cause of the death of four Americans in Benghazi. It is nothing of the sort. The attack at Benghazi was an attack by proxy to stop the flow of arms and fighters on a mission to oust Assad and destabilize Syria, which is Russia’s red line in the sand.
Regarding Benghazi, the Select Committee on Benghazi, led by Trey Gowdy, will begin in about a month. We shall see whether this committee will be effective in ferreting out the truth, or be muzzled like the other queries before it. I expect that we will hear one of two things; either the committee will succumb to the official narrative that Benghazi was “a failure of security,” or less likely, provide the refreshing truth that it was a covert yet broadly orchestrated mission involving interwoven groups running arms and fighters across North Africa with sights set on Syria. The latter would then identify the true beneficiaries of this globalist agenda—the Saudis—and their captive agent in the Oval Office. This will not be permitted to happen, in my view, considering the “gang of eight” who knew the agenda far in advance.
As Benghazi blew up in the faces of Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, the larger plot to oust Assad had to take different forms. Yet, the American public had awakened, even if for a few moments, and said “no” and “hell no” to yet another offensive or war in the Middle East. This pushback, however, did not stop the Obama-Saudi alliance from additional attempts to engage us in a conflict. We were treated to false flag events that included a chemical weapons attack purportedly conducted at the hands of Assad. Other attempts were made to engage us, yet our collective stomachs were full of the bile of this Renegade-in-Chief’s agenda.
As time marched on, we bore witness to the selection and installation of John O. Brennan as head of the CIA, an interesting choice considering his former involvement not just with the CIA, but with Obama and in particular, the Saudis. It is important to note his reported role in the passport office break-in in 2008, and his possible role with the video that supposedly sparked riots throughout the Middle East, leading to the attacks of 9/11/12. We also saw Hillary Rodham Clinton extricate herself from Foggy Bottom, a political move as she must insulate herself from the continued controversy of a foreign policy contrary to U.S. interests, especially if she intends to seek the 2016 democratic presidential nomination.
Clinton’s natural replacement was none other than John Kerry, whose personal and professional history is conducive to the globalist agenda. It is at this point where we see the actual birth of ISIS.
During John Kerry’s Middle East foreign policy tour during the 2013 Christmas and 2014 New Year, we heard Kerry state that the United States will not intervene in Iraq, which at this time is falling like a rock to jihadist terror groups. It was at this time that ISIS was birthed from conception to reality by Obama’s “hands-off” approach and Kerry’s implementation of the same. The U.S. essentially left our military hardware, Toyota Tundras and Humvees, keys still in the ignition, arms and other assets and walked away upon orders from the Renegade-in-Chief.
This action permitted the formation of a rag-tag group of hardline terrorists to suddenly become fully armed and hardened, now birthed with the necessary firepower to wipe out any Iraqi military and police presence, the presence we trained, equipped and promised to back-up, yet unceremoniously reneged on our promise. This allowed ISIS members to give the Iraqi military and police one of two choices: leave or die. Many chose the former, but unfortunately many others were caught in the latter, looking for the assistance promised by the U.S. They are no longer looking.
Now equipped with some of the best hardware American taxpayer money could buy, ISIS began to grow and overtake the region, perhaps somewhere on the eighth hole of one of Obama’s perpetual golf games. Was it incompetence? It would appear doubtful based on the evidence to date.
Understand that the ouster of Assad against the wishes of Putin remains a primary objective of this globalist crowd of U.S. and foreign leaders. We’ve opened up a new front via the creation of ISIS to get to Assad and Syria, a move fully understood by Putin. Meanwhile, the globalist leaders, including the IMF which was first on the ground in Ukraine, also opened up the Ukrainian front against Russia and Putin, to keep him occupied while the U.S.-Saudi globalist alliance is busy in the Middle East. We are watching a global chess game for power at multiple levels, and these seemingly disparate events are linked by a globalist agenda.
The globalist leaders seem to be making their boldest moves yet to bring about the conditions necessary to unite the world against a nebulous terror threat known as ISIS. The open southern borders have provided unfettered access into the United States by ISIS members, or at least the perception of infiltration, as we prepare for the next 9/11 event. While we’ve seen so many “false flag” scenarios in our lifetime, from the Gulf of Tonkin to more recent domestic events, we can be certain of one thing: an event on par with, or exceeding that of 9/11, is needed to get the attention of the American public. It is the only thing that will serve to galvanize the public into acceptance of a new front, a new war, a new offensive, or the method to get us to rally behind the agenda we have so far rejected. This is the reason that the situation today is so precarious. Simply stated, false flags and the cry for the need of additional foreign entanglements aren’t working anymore.
Is ISIS a threat to us? Indeed it is, but one made in the basement laboratories of the globalists and the lawless leaders of our own government, and those of our allies.
The end-game objective is to create a threat so dangerous and nebulous that we must come together in a globalist fashion. Most Americans would not relinquish their national sovereignty to a one world government structure—not now, not yet. They would not consider a one world, or “new world” order under the present conditions. The attacks of September 11, 2001 softened us up to accept a Third Reich formation of “homeland security” and caused many otherwise rational Americans to accept a fatal blow to our civil liberties. Think about what the next attack of an equal or greater magnitude will accomplish. Oh, by the way, does anyone recall a recent report of a few missing nuclear weapons?
May God be with us all.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Forty years ago this week, our country experienced a monumental constitutional crisis that led to the first and only resignation of a sitting president in our nation’s history. Richard M. Nixon resigned from the U.S. Presidency forty years ago this Friday, August 8, 1974 consequential to three Articles of Impeachment that were adopted by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on July 27th, 29th and 30th, 1974.
Article One addressed Nixon’s obstruction of justice, Article Two his abuse of power, and Article Three his contempt of Congress. Concluding each article, the following terminology was used to describe the actions of the President:
[The President] “…acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.”
I ask every reader to set aside personal bias and carefully consider those words of the House Judiciary Committee in the context of today’s standards after reading the Articles of Impeachment here. Also consider… that was “then.”
History books tell us that Nixon’s impeachment was the culmination of the investigation of the June 17, 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C., and the his administration’s conspiracy to cover-up its involvement. The investigation led to the discovery of an array of numerous other abuses of power, including but not limited to the use of the IRS, the FBI and the CIA to harass political opponents (and others), obstructing official investigations into such activities, and in general, subverting the U.S. Constitution as detailed above.
In total, 43 other individuals, many who were top officials in Nixon’s administration, were indicted, tried, convicted and jailed for their roles in the conspiracy that was actively subverting the U.S. Constitution—our rule of law. We had, at least, a partially functioning Judicial Branch of our government. That was then.
In the days long before the internet, the corporate media played an integral role in keeping pressure on elected officials to investigate Richard M. Nixon and members of his administration. We had a competitive, rather than a “captured” media. We had an independent media of diverse ownership. Admittedly, it was still biased and operated under certain agendas, but there still existed tireless journalists searching for truth and unafraid of harassment. That was then.
Those of us old enough will recall how we were riveted to our televisions for the hours of hearings from May through August, 1973. Many businessmen and women could be seen standing opportunistically in front of the bulky store televisions watching reports during their lunch hours. Most of us actually cared about the state and direction of our country instead of possessing a feeling of despair and hopelessness. That was before the mantra that “you cannot fight city hall” was ingrained into our collective psyche by the very people who don’t want you to fight, because they know that we can win on the numbers. That was then.
The print media, meanwhile, mostly led by The Washington Post and The New York Times, contained article upon article of the growing scandal, the result of leaks from anonymous sources. Journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post took the point on the leaks from a then-unidentified source referenced only as “Deep Throat,” later identified as Mark Felt, a long-time FBI agent who briefly served as the Associate Director during the Nixon administration. Anonymous sources, or sources known only to journalists, were once considered sacred to those who were “known and trusted.” Their anonymity was closely guarded from prying, spying eyes of “big brother” for the sake of truth, much to the ire of those under the microscope of investigation. That was the time of wearing out shoe leather as intrepid reporters pushed out from behind their desks and actually chased leads and sources. Journalists were willing to fight for the scoop and were not intimidated by the tactics of an increasingly oppressive government. Of course, that was then.
Yes, that was then. It was the spring and summer of 1974, when Americans seemed to have had enough of the lawlessness of and within the executive branch. Even without the internet, they had seen, heard and read enough to demand accountability—demand that the checks and balances built into our constitution be activated. It may be reasonably argued that our constitutional system of government worked, and the weight of the Articles of Impeachment was too great for Nixon to overcome. Arguably, our nation’s chief executive did not want to put our country through the turmoil that further legislative and judicial action would likely cause. As such, he did the “honorable” thing and resigned. It was before the orchestrated “Balkanization” of America took over completely, before all morality was completely stripped out of every aspect of the halls of power, and America was still considered somewhat of a sovereign nation.
Obviously, politics and politicians were different in some respects at that time; lawlessness was much less overt, except for the occasional embarrassing scandal that reared its ugly head from time to time.
Who can forget the powerful democratic U.S. Congressman Wilbur Mills, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and his very public meeting with destiny later that same year? And by “destiny,” I mean Annabelle Battistella, an exotic dancer known by her trade name of Fanne Foxe. It was on October 9, 1974, when Mills was stopped by the Park Police for a traffic incident. Mills was obviously intoxicated and appeared to have suffered a trashing by the fingernails of the dancer. Apparently afraid, Foxe leapt from Mills’ car and unceremoniously took a header into the nation’s Tidal Basin in an attempt to escape. Although Mills was reelected in November, he at least had the momentary lapse of integrity to step down from his position of Congressional chairmanship and sought help for his alcoholism.
That was then, before the unbridled arrogance shown by the finger wagging William Jefferson Clinton to every American, asserting that he “did not have sex with that woman.” Indeed, that was then, before “CSI: White House” was a prime-time special and the stained blue dress of shame became a monument to presidential hubris. It was really never about sex, though, not even “then.” It was about respect for the office. More importantly, it was about respect for the rule of law— the U.S. Constitution.
It was out of respect for the U.S. Constitution that on December 19, 1998, the House of Representatives passed two Articles of Impeachment against President William Jefferson Clinton. Contrary to what young people might believe today, the Clinton impeachment proceedings were not about sex, but about the very serious charges of perjury and obstruction of justice by the highest elected official in the U.S. The impeachment led nowhere, for the Senate refused to remove Clinton from office, a decision decided largely along party lines. As the morality of our nation changed, so too did the direction of our country.
Today, four decades later post-Watergate and 15 years after the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton, the current occupant of the Oval Office is appropriately referred to by the United States Secret Service by his codename “Renegade.” As I’ve previously pointed out, the term renegade is synonymous with the nature of being lawless and traitorous, so I have therefore dubbed him the “Renegade-in-Chief.”
Based on our this brief historical overview, it is easy to see how far our nation has devolved into an abyss of immorality and even more aggressive “finger wagging” at the citizens of our country. Our capture is nearly complete.
For what we have witnessed since the selection of Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a “chief executive” lacking authenticated proof of constitutional eligibility has been one scandal after another, each exponentially dwarfing the collection of conspiracies known as Watergate, Mills, and Clinton combined.
Along with the Renegade-in-Chief and his band of traitorous associates, the legislative branch of the United States has become seditious in their own right by failing to represent their constituents or uphold the rule of law. Perhaps it is the result of well over forty years of infiltration by socialist-leaning and communist-adoring Progressives, combined with the giant leftward leap of whatever remains of the entire political spectrum that has brought us where we are today.
Today, instead of acting as journalists, the captured corporate media serve as lapdogs to an unclothed emperor. They have proclaimed Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama—their messiah who is untouchable by scandal or crime. Those who complain about Obama do so within prescribed limits, never touching the all-important third rails such as his eligibility, his background and his allegiance. Their silence is deafening as chaos reigns supreme with our open borders, wholesale spying on Americans, and a Judiciary unwilling to enforce the rule of law.
Many Americans, at least those who know something is amiss, have been nearly lobotomized by the constant assertion that we “cannot fight city hall.” Forty years ago, there were still those of us who believed we could fight city hall—and win. We still can win today, but it’s going to take all of us who are awake to recognize that we endured the last offense to our Constitution.
Unless you’re a fool, you know that there is trouble heading our way. Our way of life is about to take a radical change as the U.S. Dollar is about to be killed in an orchestrated collapse. We are being forced into a virtual North American Union by the intentional erasure of our southern border without our consent. We are being forced into class warfare. We are being lied to everyday by the most powerful who are facilitated by the media, who are perpetuating the lies.
Four decades ago, there was an impeachment that resulted in a resignation of a sitting president and the incarceration of almost four dozen top administration officials. Fifteen years ago, there was an impeachment but without consequence to the man and people behind obstruction and lies. Today, there is virtual silence as we rapidly descend into tyranny. Forty years ago, our objections were heard and acted upon. Fifteen years ago, our objections were acknowledged. Today, those in power are laughing at us.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
It is evident that Potomac Fever that has been running rampant among the denizens of our halls of power and their media sycophants has mutated in the more deadly form of Denial Virus. The problem, however, is that those most infected are quite often merely the carriers of this insidious disease and not the ultimate victims. No, the victims that will suffer from these diseases and their mutations, and might succumb to their deadly effects is the population at large – the citizens of the United States.
The problem, though, is that the disease and its mutations cause intellectual blindness and the inability to see the big picture among its victims. To determine whether you, or those around you are infected by the deadly Denial Virus, please consult the following.
Signs that you are infected with Denial Virus include but are not limited to:
There are more symptoms, but I’ll stop here for the sake of brevity.
Unfortunately, it appears that the Denial Virus contagion has infected much of the population at large. History will show that it could have been stopped had it not been for the carriers and those infected with its initial form, Potomac Fever and other related contagions.
Perhaps one of the most unfortunate aspects is that this deadly disease was exacerbated and permitted to spread in early 2008 by pseudo-conservatives, conservative radio and television talk show hosts, as well as many republican based forums and websites who marginalized anyone who dared to question the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, labeling us with such pejorative terms as “Birthers,” racists, and bigots.
You see, it was never simply about where Barack Hussein Obama was born, but the larger issue of who Barack Hussein Obama is. Stated differently, it was, and still is about his allegiance to the United States and its people. It was about his Marxist and Muslim roots and biases, the very same traits that have virtually set the Middle East ablaze, and destroyed (or finished off, to be more precise) the U.S. economy.
It was also about his policy and paymaster, Saudi Arabia, for which our men and women in uniform are dying and whose agenda we are ultimately fulfilling. It was about the powers behind Saudi Arabia, the globalists, who needed a Manchurian Candidate to complete the tasks that are paving the way for a North American Union and a global union, or a New World Order.
It was and is about the people appointed to power by this Renegade-in-Chief, made possible only by his selection, election and reelection.
As the Denial Virus has become an epidemic, it is unlikely that simply removing the carriers from office, positions of power, or from the captured corporate media will be enough to save the patient, the United States. Left unchecked for so long and exacerbated by those in positions of trust, and those we trusted, regardless of party affiliation, the Denial Virus has caused extreme damage to the essential functions of the body at large.
It would appear that the only effective conservative treatment in order to save those yet to be infected is to “quarantine” the carriers and those who have deliberately acted to spread the deadly virus so they might no longer pose a threat to our nation. Once quarantined, live “trials” should follow.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Today, every American, everyone in the West needs to step away from their backyard barbeques and pool parties and pay close attention, look long and hard at what is being engineered in Iraq, for life as we know it will soon change. For Americans, Iraq is a half a world away. For others, it is much closer. For everyone, though, it’s soon to become very personal for all of us.
America, the West, and the world is bearing witness to one of the most significant geopolitical events of the last century taking place in Iraq and throughout the Middle East. But few fully understand the enormity of what they are seeing. Even fewer understand the big picture or think big enough, as all is not what it appears. We are witnessing the second act of the play about which I’ve previously written, which is the setting of the stage for World War III. Our world as we know it will soon change, and no one will be left untouched by the events that have been orchestrated by the globalist screenwriters and directors.
The average American sees sudden, unexpected chaos, death, and destruction in Iraq. Elected leaders, the corporate media, and cheerleaders of partisan politics present these events as unfortunate and unforeseeable, or even worse, a consequence of the alleged incompetence by the Renegade-in-Chief and his determined band of outlaws. They are, however, neither based on incompetence nor were they unforeseeable. Rather, we are watching the opening scene of “Act Two,” which is the final cast placement in the run-up to World War III as was always intended and long in the making, separated only by a brief intermission due to the public exposure of Benghazi.
Briefly, the first part of the latest play taking place on the global stage began with the fictional tale of the Arab Spring, which was supposedly a spontaneous uprising by freedom fighters against oppressive tyrants. It was neither spontaneous nor engineered at the hands of lovers of freedom. It was a Western intelligence operation designed to change the balance of power for future events, future acts of the play on the world stage. An important act of the play involved Libya and the ouster of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, as I detailed in my August 3, 2013 column titled Unmasking the Embassy Threat.
In my earlier column of October 8, 2012 titled Lemmings…At the precipice of WW III, I warned that “we are at the precipice of global conflict, WW III. The killing of Ambassador Stevens and other Americans in Libya was merely the prelude, like the opening scenes in a Bond film, but we haven’t yet grasped how it relates to the rest of the script. During the ‘Arab Spring’ we thought we were seeing trailers for several different films before the main attraction, but little did we know how seamlessly the various clips all tie together at the end. The show has already started.” We are now well into the opening act after intermission.
As I wrote, “If the script proceeds as written, the entire geopolitical world and balance of power could, and most likely will, change with this next curtain call. No one will be left untouched by the coming events.” And now, here we are. Following the last curtain call, we are watching the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), a U.S. CIA/DOS backed organization, taking over Iraq with relative ease. Cue the video cameras and audience attention to the U.S. embassy in Baghdad for a flashback to the April 30, 1975 airlift. The march of ISIS will proceed as intended, but it will not stop at Baghdad. They are headed for Syria and have their sights set on removing Bashir al-Assad from power.
It’s unlikely that you will see the multitudes of new Toyota pick-ups or the NATO/Western military armaments currently in use by the Muslim Brotherhood-backed ISIS on your television screen, as the global power brokers would rather keep those telling images from anyone who might be paying close attention in America. It was the current Secretary of State John Kerry, following the lead of his predecessor Hillary Rodham Clinton, answering to the current Renegade-in-Chief and his globalist handlers, who toured the Middle East in late December of 2013 and gave ISIS the green light to “do what they will” as the U.S. would not interfere. Not only would the U.S. take a step back, but we would also leave our military hardware and armaments intact for ISIS to conduct their blood sacrifices in typical Wahhabi fashion.
It’s unlikely that the corporate media will expose that the development of ISIS was years in the making, first developing in 2004 as “The Organization of Monotheism and Jihad” (JTJ) and then as al Qaeda in Iraq. In 2006, they changed their name to the Islamic State of Iraq and more recently to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) as it is known today.
It’s even more unlikely that you will hear about the financing of ISIS, for it is perhaps the most heavily funded terror organization in the world. Even before ISIS overran Mosul last week and pillaged Iraqi banks of hundreds of millions of dollars, ISIS financial documents that were seized during operations in Iraq disclosed that their net worth before they entered Mosul to be at least $900 million. Where did such robust funding come from? A review of their meticulous financial documentation found that much of the wealth possessed by ISIS came from the oil fields they seized in Eastern Syria earlier this year. Yes, Syria. Now their net worth is now over $2 billion, or some speculate about $200,000 per ISIS terrorist. This is no ragtag, unsupported group of spontaneous and opportunistic terrorists, although the Obama-Hillary-Rice-Benghazi narrative is once again in play, this time in Iraq.
Based on the funding and military assets alone, it should be obvious to anyone paying the least bit of attention that ISIS is a creation of Western-backed intelligence agencies, spearheaded by the U.S., and funded in part through the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that has its own headquarters based inside our own White House, State Department, and CIA.
The events of today are not taking place in a vacuum. I have written many times about the significance of Benghazi, the third rail of U.S. politics and media. The attack in Benghazi that claimed four American lives was a planned event at the nation-state level, a proxy battle by Russia to expose the flow of weapons from northern Africa into Syria, Turkey, Jordan and other key areas for the sole purpose of toppling Assad and installing a Muslim Brotherhood government, much like Egypt. Despite four separate attempts to blame Assad for crimes against humanity, including the use of chemical weapons, the non-corporate media exposed the false flags for what they were. Accordingly, the globalists had to switch to “plan B” to topple Assad.
Today, the global power brokers are using ISIS to march through Baghdad and into Syria through the newly opened southeastern front via Iraq. They are using our assets and our blessing to do so, which should cause Americans to ask for what did some 4,500 U.S. soldiers die? As Iraq is being transformed into a nation-state of hard line al Qaeda and Taliban related terrorists known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), one can only imagine the sadness and outrage of every American family who has been personally touched by the death, disfigurement, or permanent debilitation of their loved ones in the military. The sand and soil of a land far away has yet to absorb all of their blood that has been shed under the guise of freedom and amid a patriotic fervor scripted by the studios of the globalists. Perhaps the advance knowledge that we would turn over the controlling reins of Iraq, known only to the globalist script writers and certain cast members, is the reason that returning veterans would one day be considered a domestic terror threat, for it is indeed an understandable response to an insidious plot.
The bigger picture has always been Syria via the “Death race to Damascus” as I detailed in my column dated January 20, 2014. The bigger picture has always been to topple Assad and take Syria. So, when all of this comes unraveled, and it will- look for it to explode eastward into Saudi Arabia, into the Arab sea, north into Iran, and all the way to the Strait of Hormuz. And when—not if—it does, that attack will not just damage shipping and the free flow of oil into Western markets, it will kill the dollar and with it the hopes and dreams not just of the U.S., but western civilization itself.
The ultimate goal is to kill the U.S. dollar through a proxy war with Russia while the Renegade-in-Chief, his band of outlaws and his global financiers hide under the pretext of plausible deniability. For it is the destruction of the middle class through economic Armageddon, vis-a-vis killing the dollar, that is needed to create a new global economic order and, ultimately, the destruction of the sovereignty of the United States.
Lastly, perhaps those on both sides of the faux political spectrum and their respective cheerleaders understand why many of us were so concerned about the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the highest office in the land. It was never a distraction, but a matter of allegiance to the United States. Look at what’s taking place and ask yourself for whom is Obama really working. It’s certainly not the people of United States of America.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
“Think about it. After his party nomination, someone within the WHCA had to pick a codename for Obama and they chose “Renegade.” Out of the (approximate) 171,000 words listed in the Oxford English Dictionary, the word that suggests one who exhibits traitorous, lawless and radical behavior was chosen before Obama actually assumed office. What are the odds?”
Doug Hagmann
It’s eerily undeniable. There is a psychic or perhaps even several working at the White House Communications Agency (WHCA) and the United States Secret Service. There’s no other way to explain it, unless one is otherwise inclined to suggest that a vast inter-agency conspiracy exists deep within the bowels of the agency once controlled by the White House Military Office.
How else is one able to explain the uncanny accuracy with which the WHCA supplied the United State’s Secret Service the not-so-secret codename for Barack Hussein Obama at the very onset of his reign? Obama’s codename: Renegade.
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, a renegade is defined as “an individual who rejects lawful or conventional behavior.” Synonyms of renegade include outlaw, radical, and traitorous. (For the victims of the Common Core educational initiative, a synonym is a word that has the same meaning as another word in the same language).
Think about it, however. After his party nomination, someone within the WHCA had to pick a codename for Obama and they chose “Renegade.” Out of the (approximate) 171,000 words listed in the Oxford English Dictionary, the word that suggests one who exhibits traitorous, lawless and radical behavior was chosen before Obama actually assumed office. What are the odds? And just who is this grand-master psychic-wizard extraordinaire who just happened to be able to see into the future of the Obama reign of tyranny, lawlessness and traitorous behavior to be able to match, ever so precisely, his codename with his agenda? I’d like to buy that person lunch, for the selfish purpose, though, of making an inquiry about tomorrow’s winning lottery numbers.
My in-depth investigation found that the first choice submitted to the United States Secret Service was rejected, however. The name originally submitted to be Obama’s codename was “Quisling.” (For the victims of the Progressive public educational system, a quisling is defined as a person who helps an enemy that has taken control of his or her country).
Although quisling would have been even more apropos, the Secret Service has a policy that the codename must be easily pronounced and readily understood by those who transmit and receive voice messages by radio or telephone regardless of their native language. Also, considering that “quisling” might be too easily recognizable or overt, even by the victims of the Common Core educational initiative, and too objectionable by the politically correct thought police, they must have handled their disappointment by a thorough search of a thesaurus.
Could it be that there is at least one remote viewer, clairvoyant, witch, or warlock who has the ability to peer into the future working inside the WHCA? Consider Obama’s disdain for Constitutional law, his lawlessness, radical and arguably traitorous actions since assuming office, traits that concisely conform to his codename given in advance of his reign. Also, consider that his codename was assigned in the absence of any authenticated pedigree or proper vetting to confirm his Constitutional eligibility to hold the highest office in the land.
By the admission of the United States Secret Service and the White House Communications Agency, we’ve got a renegade in office. A man of lawlessness and perfidiousness. By the headlines that constantly provide a lengthy list of scandals and crimes under and around Obama and his reckless abandon of the U.S. Constitution, the codename that he was given confirmed his agenda in advance. And ever so appropriately, he’s referenced by this befitting moniker every day by the U.S. Secret Service. Hindsight, or in this case foresight, was indeed 20-20.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Although numerous unanswered questions continue to plague the Obama White House about the criminal and murderous events of the Benghazi attacks on September 11, 2012, there is one single question that needs to be asked with absolute precision and answered with authenticated specificity.
It is the question that Obama and a very small contingent of his innermost circle fear the most, for it is my professional investigative assessment, based on insider information, that the answer to this question alone will cause the immediate demands for the impeachment and removal from office of Barack Hussein Obama. It is this precise question:
Where exactly within the White House was Barack Hussein Obama, from the time he left the Oval Office at approximately 7:30 p.m. ET, until the following day when he boarded Air Force One destined for Las Vegas, who was he with, and what were the exact nature of his activities during this period?
– Doug Hagmann
Unfortunately, I have significant doubts that specific answers to this multi-part question, subject to verification by Secret Service logs, will be forthcoming or cross-referenced with other internal White House logs and other records that are known to be kept and maintained. I also have serious doubts that the Select Committee will press the issue beyond any vague, superficial and peripheral testimony offered by those called before the investigative body.
It is this one particular question—and a complete, truthful and verifiable answer—that has the ability to completely change the perception of events that have been carefully crafted like a cheap paint-by-numbers picture set suitable for children 8-12 years of age.
Just where was the Commander-in-Chief while Americans were fighting for their lives and awaiting assistance that would never arrive? We now know where he wasn’t, which was in the White House situation room. What activities could possibly take precedence over even a brief “pop-in” to the Situation Room for a strategic, election-year photo-op? Think about that and all that it implies for a moment.
Based on information supplied to me by two insider sources, the truthful answers to this multi-part question will never be disclosed—ever. Based on one DC insider who is legally muzzled by multiple national security secrecy oaths, “negotiations” are in progress (or perhaps complete) to make certain the committee will stay away from this question beyond a very narrow line of inquiry. This explains the ostensible partisan cooperation under the direction of Nancy Pelosi, according to my source. There is immense pressure being forced upon the committee chair and others to stay away from this line of questioning beyond the requisite superficiality designed for our entertainment.
Moreover, I have been informed that the Secret Service logs, White House visitor logs, and cross-referencing records “including and especially of those individuals present in the private presidential quarters that would identify the names, ages, and alleged purpose for their presence” will never be remitted, at least not in their original form, if at all. Furthermore, any answers relating to this question by witness testimony will not be properly reconciled with any documentation at the depth required.
Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, CIA whistle blower, posed 11 questions about Benghazi to elected officials from both political parties and received no responses in return. I pose one, publicly, for it is the truthful answer to this question that is, and forever will be, the “third rail” of the deepest recesses of insider knowledge.
Wait. Watch. And mark my words.
