By Douglas J. Hagmann
The pictures of children suffering horrible deaths from the apparent chemical weapons attack in Syria moved even the most callous of our population. According to one recently published report, the latest death toll stands at 72, including 20 children.
These victims experienced horrible, excruciating deaths. They suffered burns from the chemicals and dismemberment from the shrapnel and impact of the ordinances. The photographs and videos were difficult to look at and watch, but they were nonetheless presented by the media with minimal censorship for the greatest of impact.
The United States, largely moved by the shock created by the images and having the proper moral outrage, responded by firing 59 cruise missiles at a reported cost of $60 million to U.S. taxpayers.
Meanwhile, the same government that spent $60 million to avenge these horrific deaths on the other side of the world spent $500 million – a half-billion dollars – of taxpayer funds at home last year not to save, but to supplement the cost of killing nearly one million children, in part, through the funding of Planned Parenthood.
The unborn children with fully formed bodies were also burned by chemicals and dismembered. More egregiously, some of their tiny body parts were then reportedly sold as documented by the authenticated covert video footage obtained by undercover operatives David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt Center for Medical Progress.
While the images of the children victims of the chemical attack in Syria continue to flood the media and social networking streams, the responses by the corporate media and social media monopolies to the images and videos obtained by Mr. Daleiden and Ms. Merritt were (and are) less than welcoming.
Consider this paradoxical, if not altogether schizophrenic reaction to the brutal and horrible murder of innocent children. While the horrible slaughter of 20 innocent children warrants the launching of 59 tomahawk missiles, the continued slaughter of nearly a million unborn children per year is not merely ignored, but subsidized.
This is not intended to minimize or otherwise understate the brutal attack in Syria, but to further expose the naked hypocrisy of those who claim to be advocates of “the children.”
This blatant hypocrisy is further illustrated by the U.S. government’s response to the authenticated investigative footage secured by Mr. Daleiden and Ms. Merritt. Rather than having their investigative findings shown in the same manner as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, their investigative work product was confiscated by the government and used as the basis to file 15 felony charges against them on March 28, 2017 by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
The corporate media celebrates this selective prosecution by ignoring the larger and more despicable crime of selling human organs from the murdered unborn, brokered like the sale of car parts, while demonizing those who dare expose such crimes.
The social media collective further facilitates this depraved agenda through selective censorship to advance this dystopian agenda under the absurd pretext of acceptable community standards.
Meanwhile, unhinged pink pussy-hat wearing Amazonian women and their testosterone-deficient, emasculated and self-loathing male supporters, in an embarrassingly shameful public display of their shared intellectual frailties, march in solidarity to support their right to use chemical weapons against innocents.
A very strange paradox indeed.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
From abortion to illegal immigration is but a short step, although at first glance, they are seemingly unrelated. In reality, the two issues are intertwined.
It is imperative that we understand the end-game objectives of those pushing both agendas, for they are the same conspirators who are shredding the United States Constitution and destroying our country from within. They are using many of the same tactics and pushing many of the same lies that are left unchecked by politicians and political pundits on both sides of the political spectrum.
While watching a recent panel discussion on Fox News, the supposed voice of the conservative right, the subject of deporting illegal aliens arose. At issue was Donald Trump’s position that illegal aliens should be deported. But what about children born to illegal aliens on U.S. soil, often termed “anchor babies?”
According to these legal scholars, they surely cannot be deported, for they are granted automatic citizenship under the 14th Amendment to the United States. This statement was made as if it was fact, and went completely unchallenged throughout this discussion.
Viewers were led to believe that babies born to those here illegally are automatically granted citizenship. I urge the reader to carefully consider that position and how many times we’ve heard it and accepted it as fact. Then, perform research to see whether that is, in fact, a true statement.
We have all heard the term “anchor baby,” which is a descriptive, and considered by many to be a pejorative term to describe the child of a women in the U.S. illegally having a child on U.S. soil. Numerous legal scholars and sources having specific agendas often cite the concept of Jus Soli as the basis for granting a child born on U.S. soil to a woman here illegally automatic citizenship.
As if to affirm the concept of Jus Soli, politicians and political pundits assert that the United States Supreme Court, in the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark (169 U.S. 649 (1898)) that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship for nearly all individuals born in the country, regardless of their parents’ citizenship or immigration status. This is a lie that has been repeated so often that few dare challenge its legitimacy.
It has been repeated so frequently that any challenges are usually unceremoniously dismissed, or the argument gets deliberately diverted, ultimately reinforcing the erroneous stipulation that the newly born child is automatically granted U.S. citizenship.
To make it simple, the following eight words eliminate any confusion as to the status of children born in the United States to a woman here illegally: The child follows the condition of the parents.
For those who do not have the time to research the Annals of Congress and the Congressional Record, I would direct you to the extensive and enlightening research already performed by Dr. John Coleman, a prolific author and someone who has performed decades of research in this area. This issue is elegantly explained in his book, What You Should Know about the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The simple yet accurate rebuttal to anyone wishing to muddy the waters, create confusion, manipulate the language of the United States Constitution, or to otherwise advance their globalist agenda is found in that short sentence: The child follows the condition of the parents.
Moreover, that one sentence not only addresses so-called anchor babies, but it further offers the unborn child inherent protection to life as expressed by the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution. It is hardly a coincidence that most of the proponents of illegal immigration and the granting of citizenship status through the perversion of the Constitution are often one and the same.
One must carefully sift through the manipulation of the linguistic landscape to understand that we’ve been (and continue to be) lied to by the politicians and pundits who have perverted the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights to achieve their Globalist-Communist-Marxist-Fabian Socialist goals of changing the actual landscape of our nation. Make no mistake, both sides of the political spectrum are deeply involved in this doctrine of deception.
Further citing the works of Dr. John Coleman, he notes that the 14th Amendment used by elected officials and legal scholars alike to advance their agenda of a social utopia was never ratified, yet is cited as the legal basis to grant children of illegal aliens in the U.S. citizenship. The 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the states wherein they reside” [emphasis mine].
To further clarify the highlighted phrase, we consult Vattel’s Law of Nations, which states that “to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will only be the place of his birth and not his country” [emphasis mine].
From this, “the bottom line” should be abundantly clear. If a woman, illegally residing within the borders of the United States has a baby, neither the woman nor the child is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. As the child follows the condition of the parents, their status is clear: they too are present inside our country illegally and most certainly can and should be subjected to deportation.
Everything else is a deliberate perversion of the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights by those complicit in the destruction of our nation from within. Infanticide and illegal immigration are two of the most insidious yet effective measures being used to advance the agenda of our enslavement and their Socialist-Communist global utopia. Their enemy is an educated public that refuses to accept their perversion of truth.
Pray and prepare, for the time of reckoning is here.
Many baby boomers will recall the classic 1962 Twilight Zone episode To Serve Man, about a seemingly benevolent alien race of giants coming to earth to solve the ills of mankind. Although some people were initially suspicious of the aliens’ intentions, their skepticism was assuaged when the aliens shared their advanced technology and made the earth a better place to live, stopping wars and increasing the food harvests of the planet. Soon, regular flights to the aliens’ home planet were arranged for the masses. Scenes showed countless people excitedly boarding space ships for the vacation of a lifetime. (Spoiler alert). A book left by the aliens, titled To Serve Man, was ultimately deciphered by government cryptographers and it was determined to be… a cook book.
The episode is presented as a flashback of a man aboard a space ship on its way to the aliens’ home planet. In his closing narrative, the man looks at the camera and asks, “[H]ow about you? You still on Earth, or on the ship with me? Really doesn’t make very much difference, because sooner or later, we’ll all be on the menu…all of us.” And therein lies the real story, the metaphorical sucker punch of this episode and the actual operational playbook of Planned Parenthood.
You see, the playbook of Planned Parenthood has been deciphered through the covert videos taken by the Center for Medical Progress. They have been exposed for exactly who they are and what they are doing, and the truth is making them and their facilitators very uncomfortable. Until now, the unbridled evil of their deeds has been hidden behind the unremarkable and non-threatening faces of the women depicted in the videos. Behind the masks of Drs. Nucatola, Gatter and others could be that of Josef Mengele himself.
Just because the silent screams of the unborn are inaudible as they are dismembered and their organs harvested, ostensibly for noble scientific purposes, does that make the current doctors of death any less maniacal, any less evil, or less sadistic than Mengele and his willing cohorts? No.
I would assert that there are many more similarities than differences between the subjects depicted on the covertly secured videos and the murderous “doctors” working in the concentration camps inside Nazi Germany. If there is any difference, perhaps it exists in the number of victims, for we know that the Nazi death camps were responsible for 6-8 million deaths. The murders of the unborn are far higher, however, and the body count is rising every day.
During the reign of tyranny and murder of the Nazis, a small Christian church reportedly sat near railroad tracks. According to one member’s account, the congregation would hear the trains carrying Jews to the death camps approach and pass the church. The sounds of the train wheels against the tracks, and the audible screams of the Jews coming from inside the cars as they were being transported to their deaths were heard by the Christian congregants, making them “uncomfortable.” What did the members of that Christian church do when they heard the train approach? According to this account, they did not try to save those destined for death but instead, sang hymns loud enough to cover the screams of the doomed.
I submit that the above account contains eerie similarities of the Christian church and the so-called Christians today. What is being done to save those unborn doomed for dismemberment, whose little arms and legs and hearts and lungs are being sold to the highest bidder? Christians don’t need to sing louder, for their screams are silent, and the gruesome dismemberment of the innocent is ostensibly covered under the laws of a spiritually and immoral bankrupt nation. Many otherwise sane and rational people living in the West and the United States in particular believe that a Supreme Court opinion grants them license to kill – and that makes everything acceptable. It does not.
Instead of outrage against the murder of the yet unborn, a nation rises up to condemn the killing of a single lion in Africa. Many of the same people who have vociferously taken to the social media to call for the public flogging of one man who hunted and killed a lion appear to have no problem with the murder of the more defenseless unborn. This alone should tell us all we need to know about the state of our nation, which is filled with the morally and spiritually bankrupt.
Much like the Twilight Zone episode To Serve Man, every single apologist or defender of Planned Parenthood, including the bumbling bobble-heads of both sexes in the captive media, will someday realize that they were gamed into somehow believing that the wholesale murder and trafficking of the body parts of pre-born babies was altruistic in nature. They will realize one day that Planned Parenthood is, and always has been, about eugenics and population control. They will realize, perhaps when it becomes too late, that it’s not merely about pre-birth murder, but about mass murder – period. They will realize, perhaps through socialist healthcare forced upon the American people, that “abortion” does not engage in age discrimination.
Meanwhile, as the intellectual morons entranced by a socialist utopia introduced by their alien saviors board the ships, many Christians and mainstream Christian churches are choosing to respond to the mass murder by… singing louder.
Pray. Prepare. Repent.
